Bug#1050944: Additional information

2023-09-01 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 07:04:05PM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote:
>  The debhelper-compat was intentionally set to >=11 in order to
> support backports.

Hi Vladimir,

Thank you for the reminder.  I can easily revert the change.  But to
make sure I understand the requirements, how far back do we want to
support backports of new uploads of jtreg6?

Although it wasn't part of the buster release, debhelper 13.x is
available in old-old-stable (buster) backports [0,1], which is as far as
I looked before making the change.  Is jtreg6 needed for stretch, which
is currently in EOL ELTS [2]?

Thank you,
tony

[0] https://packages.debian.org/source/buster-backports/debhelper
[1] https://packages.debian.org/source/oldoldstable-backports/debhelper
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1050944: Additional information

2023-09-01 Thread Vladimir Petko
Hi,

 The debhelper-compat was intentionally set to >=11 in order to
support backports.

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.