Bug#1056574: transition: ppp
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2024-04-19 17:11:44 +0100, Chris Boot wrote: > On 26/11/2023 11:36, Chris Boot wrote: > > On 26/11/2023 10:56, Chris Boot wrote: > > > > Any way to reduce possible breakage, or to detect and fix it > > > > before the transition starts? Like rebuilding rdeps, or checking > > > > rdep autopkgtests? > > > > > > I'll go an do some rebuilds now and see how they go. If any breakage > > > occurs it will be obvious at build time. > > > > The status of the rdeps (list taken from the tracker): > > > > connman: OK > > network-manager: OK > > pptpd: https://bugs.debian.org/1056898 > > sstp-client: https://bugs.debian.org/1056900 > > > > network-manager-fortisslvpn: https://bugs.debian.org/1056901 > > network-manager-l2tp: OK > > network-manager-pptp: OK > > network-manager-sstp: https://bugs.debian.org/1056903 > > All that's left now is pptpd (with an offer from Christoph to upload when > ready) and network-manager-fortisslvpn (with commits fixing the issues > upstream, but no upstream release). > > In the mean time, #1065940 has become a blocker for the time_t transition. I > think I'd rather upload 2.5.0 and break network-manager-fortisslvpn than > just the patch to fix the breakage. > > Would the release team be happy to continue with this transition? Please go ahead with the upload to unsable. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1056574: transition: ppp
On 26/11/2023 11:36, Chris Boot wrote: On 26/11/2023 10:56, Chris Boot wrote: Any way to reduce possible breakage, or to detect and fix it before the transition starts? Like rebuilding rdeps, or checking rdep autopkgtests? I'll go an do some rebuilds now and see how they go. If any breakage occurs it will be obvious at build time. The status of the rdeps (list taken from the tracker): connman: OK network-manager: OK pptpd: https://bugs.debian.org/1056898 sstp-client: https://bugs.debian.org/1056900 network-manager-fortisslvpn: https://bugs.debian.org/1056901 network-manager-l2tp: OK network-manager-pptp: OK network-manager-sstp: https://bugs.debian.org/1056903 All that's left now is pptpd (with an offer from Christoph to upload when ready) and network-manager-fortisslvpn (with commits fixing the issues upstream, but no upstream release). In the mean time, #1065940 has become a blocker for the time_t transition. I think I'd rather upload 2.5.0 and break network-manager-fortisslvpn than just the patch to fix the breakage. Would the release team be happy to continue with this transition? Thanks, Chris -- Chris Boot bo...@debian.org
Bug#1056574: transition: ppp
Hi, And maybe then reversing this in openfortivpn package: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056235#27 Thanks!
Bug#1056574: transition: ppp
On 26/11/2023 10:56, Chris Boot wrote: Any way to reduce possible breakage, or to detect and fix it before the transition starts? Like rebuilding rdeps, or checking rdep autopkgtests? I'll go an do some rebuilds now and see how they go. If any breakage occurs it will be obvious at build time. The status of the rdeps (list taken from the tracker): connman: OK network-manager: OK pptpd: https://bugs.debian.org/1056898 sstp-client: https://bugs.debian.org/1056900 network-manager-fortisslvpn: https://bugs.debian.org/1056901 network-manager-l2tp: OK network-manager-pptp: OK network-manager-sstp: https://bugs.debian.org/1056903 Cheers, Chris -- Chris Boot bo...@debian.org
Bug#1056574: transition: ppp
[re-sending to include the bug, oops] On 24/11/2023 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 23/11/2023 11:54, Chris Boot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ppp Hello Release Team friends, I uploaded ppp-2.5.0-1+1 to experimental back in September, and I think it's time to unleash it on unstable, ideally in the next few days. This is an ABI break both due to the new upstream version but there are also significant changes in this release that may break dependent packages. Any way to reduce possible breakage, or to detect and fix it before the transition starts? Like rebuilding rdeps, or checking rdep autopkgtests? I'll go an do some rebuilds now and see how they go. If any breakage occurs it will be obvious at build time. The upload I'm planning, 2.5.0-1+2, only has a minor fix for loong64 and a changelog fix. As usual this isn't a traditional library package upload so the Ben file looks a bit foreign. See #890204 for a previous time we did this. I have added a tracker, should appear in an hour or two. Many thanks. Cheers, Chris -- Chris Boot bo...@debian.org
Bug#1056574: transition: ppp
On 23/11/2023 11:54, Chris Boot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ppp Hello Release Team friends, I uploaded ppp-2.5.0-1+1 to experimental back in September, and I think it's time to unleash it on unstable, ideally in the next few days. This is an ABI break both due to the new upstream version but there are also significant changes in this release that may break dependent packages. Any way to reduce possible breakage, or to detect and fix it before the transition starts? Like rebuilding rdeps, or checking rdep autopkgtests? The upload I'm planning, 2.5.0-1+2, only has a minor fix for loong64 and a changelog fix. As usual this isn't a traditional library package upload so the Ben file looks a bit foreign. See #890204 for a previous time we did this. I have added a tracker, should appear in an hour or two. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#1056574: transition: ppp
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ppp Hello Release Team friends, I uploaded ppp-2.5.0-1+1 to experimental back in September, and I think it's time to unleash it on unstable, ideally in the next few days. This is an ABI break both due to the new upstream version but there are also significant changes in this release that may break dependent packages. The upload I'm planning, 2.5.0-1+2, only has a minor fix for loong64 and a changelog fix. As usual this isn't a traditional library package upload so the Ben file looks a bit foreign. See #890204 for a previous time we did this. Thanks, Chris Ben file: title = "ppp"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ /ppp-dev/; is_good = .depends ~ /ppp \(>= 2\.5\.0-1\+~\)/ | .breaks ~ /ppp \(<< 2\.5\.0-1\+~\)/; is_bad = .depends ~ /ppp \(>= 2\.4\.9-1\+~\)/ | .breaks ~ /ppp \(<< 2\.4\.9-1\+~\)/;
