Bug#1060457: /usr/sbin/exim4: SIGSEGV when remote smtp reject the message

2024-04-09 Thread Didier Raboud
No; it's a production system, and downgrading along the past stable
releases was OK'ish; upgrading to unstable's, less so.

On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 8:52 AM Andreas Metzler  wrote:

> Control: found 1060457 4.96-15+deb12u2
>
> On 2024-04-02 Didier Raboud via Pkg-exim4-maintainers <
> pkg-exim4-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
> > wrote:
> >> Il giorno ven, 12/01/2024 alle 18.15 +0100, Andreas Metzler ha scritto:
> >>> Is this a regression in 4.96-15+deb12u4? i.e. can you still reprroduce
> >>> the issue after downgrading exim4-daemon-heavy to 4.96-15+deb12u3 [1]
> >>> (and re-reproduce after upgrading again)?
> [...]
> > This does not seem to be a regression; I tried as far back as deb12u2 and
> > the same issue could be reproduced.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Would you be able to check with 4.97, too? I intend to provide backports
> once testing has stopped being stuck due to t64.
>
> cu Andreas
> --
> `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
> so grateful to you.'
> `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
>


Bug#1060457: /usr/sbin/exim4: SIGSEGV when remote smtp reject the message

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: found 1060457 4.96-15+deb12u2

On 2024-04-02 Didier Raboud via Pkg-exim4-maintainers 
 wrote:
> wrote:
>> Il giorno ven, 12/01/2024 alle 18.15 +0100, Andreas Metzler ha scritto:
>>> Is this a regression in 4.96-15+deb12u4? i.e. can you still reprroduce
>>> the issue after downgrading exim4-daemon-heavy to 4.96-15+deb12u3 [1]
>>> (and re-reproduce after upgrading again)?
[...]
> This does not seem to be a regression; I tried as far back as deb12u2 and
> the same issue could be reproduced.

Thank you.

Would you be able to check with 4.97, too? I intend to provide backports
once testing has stopped being stuck due to t64.

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



Bug#1060457: /usr/sbin/exim4: SIGSEGV when remote smtp reject the message

2024-04-02 Thread Didier Raboud
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:49:22 +0100 Giuseppe Sacco 
wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> Il giorno ven, 12/01/2024 alle 18.15 +0100, Andreas Metzler ha scritto:
> [...]
> > Is this a regression in 4.96-15+deb12u4? i.e. can you still reprroduce
> > the issue after downgrading exim4-daemon-heavy to 4.96-15+deb12u3 [1]
> > (and re-reproduce after upgrading again)?
>
> I am going to downgrade the package and let it run for a week. I'll report
> here.

This does not seem to be a regression; I tried as far back as deb12u2 and
the same issue could be reproduced.

Best,
OdyX


Bug#1060457: /usr/sbin/exim4: SIGSEGV when remote smtp reject the message

2024-01-13 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Hello Andreas,

Il giorno ven, 12/01/2024 alle 18.15 +0100, Andreas Metzler ha scritto:
[...]
> Is this a regression in 4.96-15+deb12u4? i.e. can you still reprroduce
> the issue after downgrading exim4-daemon-heavy to 4.96-15+deb12u3 [1]
> (and re-reproduce after upgrading again)?

I am going to downgrade the package and let it run for a week. I'll report
here.

Thank you,
Giuseppe



Bug#1060457: /usr/sbin/exim4: SIGSEGV when remote smtp reject the message

2024-01-12 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-01-11 Giuseppe Sacco  wrote:
> Package: exim4-daemon-heavy
> Version: 4.96-15+deb12u4
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/sbin/exim4

> Dear Maintainer,
> I keep finding many messages like this one in paniclog:

> 2024-01-11 09:55:20 1rNqqH-008cnX-0s SIGSEGV (fault address: 0x58)
> 2024-01-11 09:55:20 1rNqqH-008cnX-0s SEGV_MAPERR
> 2024-01-11 09:55:20 1rNqqH-008cnX-0s SIGSEGV (null pointer indirection)
> 2024-01-11 09:55:20 1rNqqH-008cnX-0s SIGSEGV (2055771 delivering 
> 1rNqqH-08cnX-0s: just tried mx01.mail.icloud.com [17.57.152.5] for 
> usern...@me.com: result OK
> )
> 2024-01-11 09:55:20 1rNqqH-008cnX-0s Delivery status for usern...@me.com: got 
> 0 of 7 bytes (pipeheader) from transport process 2055771 for transport smtp
[...]

Is this a regression in 4.96-15+deb12u4? i.e. can you still reprroduce
the issue after downgrading exim4-daemon-heavy to 4.96-15+deb12u3 [1]
(and re-reproduce after upgrading again)?

cu Andreas

[1] 
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-daemon-heavy_4.96-15+deb12u3_amd64.deb