Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi, On 28/06/2024 17:36, Étienne Mollier wrote: Hi Gents, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, on 2024-06-27: On 27/06/2024 08:13, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: The debian-med team was kind enough to build the reverse dependencies dependencies: * https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2024/06/msg3.html They only rebuilt one of them (insighttoolkit5) afaics? The rest should be few and lightweight, so maybe you can rebuild them yourself? All you need is to configure your build tool to include the new dcmtk. Maybe bin:ratt helps you do that. Looks like there's been a misunderstanding, so I thrown a batch of rebuilds today and here are the results. The following items are regressions introduced by dcmtk in experimental, while build goes through using dcmtk from sid: * orthanc fails to configure its build; * orthanc-wsi fails to build due to failure to include openssl/hmac.h; * plastimatch fails to build from source due to missing symbol DCM_ROIObservationLabel; * sight fails to build from source due to missing symbol UID_RFC2557MIMEEncapsulationTransferSyntax. I uploaded my corresponding build logs on people[1] if you would like to further examinate the failures right away. [1]: https://people.debian.org/~emollier/transitions/dcmtk/ Otherwise: * ants still build depends on itk4 and thus the build fails to start at all, so this is not a regression; * all the other reverse dependencies were unaffected in their construction by dcmtk version bump. Please file bugs for those issues. Once that is done, you can go ahead with the transition. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk
Hi Gents, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, on 2024-06-27: > On 27/06/2024 08:13, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > The debian-med team was kind enough to build the reverse dependencies > > dependencies: > > > > * https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2024/06/msg3.html > > They only rebuilt one of them (insighttoolkit5) afaics? The rest should be > few and lightweight, so maybe you can rebuild them yourself? All you need is > to configure your build tool to include the new dcmtk. Maybe bin:ratt helps > you do that. Looks like there's been a misunderstanding, so I thrown a batch of rebuilds today and here are the results. The following items are regressions introduced by dcmtk in experimental, while build goes through using dcmtk from sid: * orthanc fails to configure its build; * orthanc-wsi fails to build due to failure to include openssl/hmac.h; * plastimatch fails to build from source due to missing symbol DCM_ROIObservationLabel; * sight fails to build from source due to missing symbol UID_RFC2557MIMEEncapsulationTransferSyntax. I uploaded my corresponding build logs on people[1] if you would like to further examinate the failures right away. [1]: https://people.debian.org/~emollier/transitions/dcmtk/ Otherwise: * ants still build depends on itk4 and thus the build fails to start at all, so this is not a regression; * all the other reverse dependencies were unaffected in their construction by dcmtk version bump. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity `-on air: Thirteen of Everything - Timeline signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk
On 27/06/2024 08:13, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:55 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Mathieu On 2024-01-13 11:47:40 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I'd like to migrate to dcmtk 3.6.8. This is a standard SONAME transition. Are the reverse dependencies known to build with the new dcmtk version? I've integrated all changes from unstable back into the experimental package. The debian-med team was kind enough to build the reverse dependencies dependencies: * https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2024/06/msg3.html They only rebuilt one of them (insighttoolkit5) afaics? The rest should be few and lightweight, so maybe you can rebuild them yourself? All you need is to configure your build tool to include the new dcmtk. Maybe bin:ratt helps you do that. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:55 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Mathieu > > On 2024-01-13 11:47:40 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > I'd like to migrate to dcmtk 3.6.8. This is a standard SONAME transition. > > Are the reverse dependencies known to build with the new dcmtk version? I've integrated all changes from unstable back into the experimental package. The debian-med team was kind enough to build the reverse dependencies dependencies: * https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2024/06/msg3.html Thanks!
Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk
Jeremy, On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:04 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > Sebastian, > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:55 PM Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Hi Mathieu > > > > On 2024-01-13 11:47:40 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > I'd like to migrate to dcmtk 3.6.8. This is a standard SONAME transition. > > > > Are the reverse dependencies known to build with the new dcmtk version? > > I still do not have access to debomatic-amd64. So I have not tested them yet. I still do not have access to debomatic-amd64. Would you like to check the reverse dependencies of dcmtk 3.6.8-3 for the transition to start ? Thank you
Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk
Sebastian, On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:55 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Mathieu > > On 2024-01-13 11:47:40 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > I'd like to migrate to dcmtk 3.6.8. This is a standard SONAME transition. > > Are the reverse dependencies known to build with the new dcmtk version? I still do not have access to debomatic-amd64. So I have not tested them yet.
Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Mathieu On 2024-01-13 11:47:40 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > I'd like to migrate to dcmtk 3.6.8. This is a standard SONAME transition. Are the reverse dependencies known to build with the new dcmtk version? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I'd like to migrate to dcmtk 3.6.8. This is a standard SONAME transition. Current status in exp: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dcmtk&suite=experimental Thanks
