Bug#1068569: RM: nfs-ganesha-ceph [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support
Hi Adam, Am 08.04.24 um 19:15 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 11:42 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: Hi Sebastian, the packages are already removed from testing and unstable. Where do you see a problem? I'm not Sebastian, but the archive disagrees with you about the packages having been removed from unstable. adsb@coccia:~$ dak ls -s unstable -a armel,armhf,i386 nfs-ganesha-ceph nfs-ganesha-rados-grace nfs-ganesha-rgw nfs-ganesha-ceph| 4.3-5 | unstable | armel, armhf, i386 nfs-ganesha-rados-grace | 4.3-5 | unstable | armel, armhf, i386 nfs-ganesha-rgw | 4.3-5 | unstable | armel, armhf, i386 Thanks for your reply. I only took a look at the current version in unstable and testing. And this is 4.3-8 with binaries for amd64 arm64 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 s390x. So the issue is, that the leftover binaries from version 4.3-5 are still in the archive. Regards Christoph OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1068569: RM: nfs-ganesha-ceph [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support
On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 11:42 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > the packages are already removed from testing and unstable. > Where do you see a problem? I'm not Sebastian, but the archive disagrees with you about the packages having been removed from unstable. adsb@coccia:~$ dak ls -s unstable -a armel,armhf,i386 nfs-ganesha-ceph nfs-ganesha-rados-grace nfs-ganesha-rgw nfs-ganesha-ceph| 4.3-5 | unstable | armel, armhf, i386 nfs-ganesha-rados-grace | 4.3-5 | unstable | armel, armhf, i386 nfs-ganesha-rgw | 4.3-5 | unstable | armel, armhf, i386 Regards, Adam
Bug#1068569: RM: nfs-ganesha-ceph [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support
Hi Sebastian, the packages are already removed from testing and unstable. Where do you see a problem? Regards Christoph Am 07.04.24 um 13:21 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: nfs-gane...@packages.debian.org, sramac...@debian.org User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Control: affects -1 + src:nfs-ganesha Control: block 1065470 by -1 Control: clone -1 -2 Control: clone -1 -3 Control: retitle -2 RM: nfs-ganesha-grace [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support Control: retitle -3 RM: nfs-ganesha-rgw [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support nfs-ganesha (4.3-6) unstable; urgency=medium . * only configure with ceph for some 64bit archs So please remove the old nfs-ganesha-ceoph, nfs-ganesha-rados-grace, and nfs-genesha-rgw binaries from armel, armhf and i386. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1068569: RM: nfs-ganesha-ceph [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: nfs-gane...@packages.debian.org, sramac...@debian.org User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Control: affects -1 + src:nfs-ganesha Control: block 1065470 by -1 Control: clone -1 -2 Control: clone -1 -3 Control: retitle -2 RM: nfs-ganesha-grace [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support Control: retitle -3 RM: nfs-ganesha-rgw [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support nfs-ganesha (4.3-6) unstable; urgency=medium . * only configure with ceph for some 64bit archs So please remove the old nfs-ganesha-ceoph, nfs-ganesha-rados-grace, and nfs-genesha-rgw binaries from armel, armhf and i386. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
