Bug#1069554: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1069554: winff: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: libreoffice-draw-nogui

2024-04-21 Thread Peter B

On 20/04/2024 21:28, Paul Gevers wrote:

Hi,

On 20-04-2024 3:22 p.m., Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: libreoffice-draw-nogui 
but it is not installable

E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
apt-get failed.


I recall rene mentioning that parts of lo are expected to not work on 
armel due to java being broken. Probably the best way forward is to 
request binary removal on armel.


Paul


Hi Paul,

Thanks for commenting.  Despite spitting out
   "Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly"

I gather soffice does not actually use Java, for pdf creation.
I hope to fix this by changing the build dependencies.

Cheers,
Peter



Bug#1069554: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1069554: winff: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: libreoffice-draw-nogui

2024-04-20 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi,

On 20-04-2024 3:22 p.m., Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: libreoffice-draw-nogui but it is 
not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
apt-get failed.


I recall rene mentioning that parts of lo are expected to not work on 
armel due to java being broken. Probably the best way forward is to 
request binary removal on armel.


Paul


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1069554: winff: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: libreoffice-draw-nogui

2024-04-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: winff
Version: 1.6.3+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armel.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> +--+
> | Install package build dependencies  
>  |
> +--+
> 
> 
> Setup apt archive
> -
> 
> Merged Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), fpc, libgtk2.0-dev, lcl, 
> lcl-qt5, build-essential, fakeroot, libreoffice-draw-nogui, libreoffice-writer
> Filtered Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), fpc, libgtk2.0-dev, lcl, 
> lcl-qt5, build-essential, fakeroot, libreoffice-draw-nogui, libreoffice-writer
> dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in 
> '/<>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'.
> Ign:1 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> Get:2 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Release [609 B]
> Ign:3 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> Get:4 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Sources [715 B]
> Get:5 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Packages [727 B]
> Fetched 2051 B in 0s (0 B/s)
> Reading package lists...
> Reading package lists...
> 
> Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> 
> 
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: libreoffice-draw-nogui but it is 
> not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/04/20/winff_1.6.3+dfsg-2_unstable-armel.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240420;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=ftbfs-20240420=lu...@debian.org=1=1=1=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.