Bug#1071940: r-cran-matrix: why depend on r-base instead of r-base-core?

2024-05-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel


On 26 May 2024 at 11:41, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
| Package: r-cran-matrix
| Version: 1.7-0-2
| Severity: wishlist
| 
| Dear Dirk Eddelbuettel,
| 
| shouldn't this package depend on r-base-core instead of r-base?
| The description of r-base says it "eases the transition from the
| pre-1.5.0 package setup" and "once installed, it can be safely removed".

This is already fixed in my sources following, I think, an earlier hint by
Graham in private email.

The current change is also because of the R 4.4.0 release of Matrix 1.7.0;
this is not a super-strong dependence but CRAN and the Matrix team decided to
have 1.7.0 released after R 4.4.0, and we tagged a small number of packages
needing a rebuild with this version of Matrix as they consumed the C API via
the headers.  The 1.5.0 transition has long been taken care of.

As this is now an open bug I will just plug it. Thanks for the report.

| Thanks for your work on the R packages.

My pleasure! And thanks so much for the kind words.

Cheers,  Dirk

| Regards,
| Jörg.

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org



Bug#1071940: r-cran-matrix: why depend on r-base instead of r-base-core?

2024-05-26 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz

Package: r-cran-matrix
Version: 1.7-0-2
Severity: wishlist

Dear Dirk Eddelbuettel,

shouldn't this package depend on r-base-core instead of r-base?
The description of r-base says it "eases the transition from the
pre-1.5.0 package setup" and "once installed, it can be safely removed".

Thanks for your work on the R packages.
Regards,
Jörg.