Bug#1072813: release.debian.org: Help doris migrate to testing
Dear Paul Il 10/06/24 20:38, Paul Gevers ha scritto: Hi, [...] If it is not a big issue on your side I would prefer to keep amd64 only. Ack, will do. Paul Thanks a lot -- Antonio Valentino
Bug#1072813: release.debian.org: Help doris migrate to testing
Hi, On 09-06-2024 9:25 a.m., Antonio Valentino wrote: The main problem with non-amd64 architecture is that I do not have easy > access to them, I'm only DM. Ack I think that in the past we had binaries for other platforms but it was quite a pain. I just reread the section of the devref about autobuilding and contrib [1]. I understand it again. If it is not a big issue on your side I would prefer to keep amd64 only. Ack, will do. Paul [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#source-and-binary-uploads OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1072813: release.debian.org: Help doris migrate to testing
Dear Paul, thanks for your quick reply. On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 22:34:07 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 08-06-2024 11:17 a.m., Antonio Valentino wrote: > Could you please clarify if there is something on my side that I should > do to allow doris to migrate? You could bootstrap doris on other architectures too, such that it's not only available on amd64 and this check of the migration tooling wouldn't block the package. It's a hint you might have not thought about doing it. If bootstrapping doris on non-amd64 isn't trivial, we can add a hint to ignore the installability on arm64. Paul The main problem with non-amd64 architecture is that I do not have easy access to them, I'm only DM. I think that in the past we had binaries for other platforms but it was quite a pain. For any small issue I needed to setup a quite lengthy process of requiring access to one of the porter-boxes, wait for the access to be granted, fix the issue, end them at the end, ask to a sponsor to build and upload binaries for different platforms. If it is not a big issue on your side I would prefer to keep amd64 only. kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Bug#1072813: release.debian.org: Help doris migrate to testing
Hi, On 08-06-2024 11:17 a.m., Antonio Valentino wrote: Could you please clarify if there is something on my side that I should do to allow doris to migrate? You could bootstrap doris on other architectures too, such that it's not only available on amd64 and this check of the migration tooling wouldn't block the package. It's a hint you might have not thought about doing it. If bootstrapping doris on non-amd64 isn't trivial, we can add a hint to ignore the installability on arm64. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1072813: release.debian.org: Help doris migrate to testing
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org doris (5.0.3~beta+dfsg-17) is not migrating to testing, the excuses suggest this is due to unsatisfiable dependency for python3-doris/arm64: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=doris the missing dependency apparently is doris itself that is not build for arm64. Apparently this situation was file before the doris removal from testing due to one of the dependencies (fastkml [1]). Now fastkml is back in tasting so I would expect that doris could be able to migrate. Could you please clarify if there is something on my side that I should do to allow doris to migrate? [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1530835/doris-removed-from-testing/ Kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
