retitle 298194 New version 0.99.2 with fixed fixed-width fonts available thanks
Staszek Wawrykiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, [iso-8859-1] Frank Küster wrote: > > FK> I seem to never have received an answer to my question whether *all* > FK> issues with the monospace fonts not being monospaced are now > FK> resolved? It was still present in 0.98. > > Bogus{\l}aw Jackowski answered: > > *All* issues will never be resolved -- you know, that after removing an n-th > bug there is always an (n+1)-th one ;-) I know... But good to hear that it should be okay now. > But at least the problem of stretchability and shrinkability of spaces > has been fixed (actually since ver. 0.98.3, 05.04.2005): > > LMTCSC10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTCSO10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTL10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTLO10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTLC10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 3.5 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTLCO10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 3.5 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTK10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTKO10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTT10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTT12.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 6.175 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTT8.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 4.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTT9.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 4.725 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTTI10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > LMTTO10.AFM: > Comment TFM fontdimen 2: 5.25 (space) > Comment TFM fontdimen 3: 0 (space stretch) > Comment TFM fontdimen 4: 0 (space shrink) > > Have I forgotten about something important? It's quite probable... I don't see anything - Florent? > Ps. The unusual width of musicalnote (e.g., in lmtt10, it has the width equal > to 641.5, while other glyph have the width equal to 525) will not be changed > as it is old Knappenian tradition ;-) Regards, Frank P.S. Sorry for the fullquote, but I'd like this info to be accessible in the Debian BTS. -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer