Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS in Squid -- any progress?

2005-04-29 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello

The bug has been reported more than a week ago and the last status from
the same date is that the Woody package is beeing investigated.

Are there any news regarding the vulnerability status of the Woody
package or the preparation of a DSA?

bye,

-christian-

-- 
Christian Hammers WESTEND GmbH  |  Internet-Business-Provider
Technik   CISCO Systems Partner - Authorized Reseller
  Lütticher Straße 10  Tel 0241/701333-11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]D-52064 Aachen  Fax 0241/911879




Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS in Squid -- any progress?

2005-04-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Christian Hammers wrote:
 Hello
 
 The bug has been reported more than a week ago and the last status from
 the same date is that the Woody package is beeing investigated.
 
 Are there any news regarding the vulnerability status of the Woody
 package or the preparation of a DSA?

Luigi is taking a look.  It's not yet clear whether this problem even
exists in woody.  Sid and sarge are fine.  If you are able to fix the
package in woody, that would help a lot.

Regards,

Joey

-- 
There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS in Squid -- any progress?

2005-04-29 Thread Christian Hammers
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:56:38PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
  Are there any news regarding the vulnerability status of the Woody
  package or the preparation of a DSA?
 
 Luigi is taking a look.  It's not yet clear whether this problem even
 exists in woody.  Sid and sarge are fine.  If you are able to fix the
 package in woody, that would help a lot.

Mandriva has fixed the bug in 2.4.STABLE7 (we have 2.4.STABLE6 in Woody)
and released an advisory today:

http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:078

Sadly I was just not able to find the following soruce package which
probably includes the patch. Does anybody know where they hide their
download server?

corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm
md5sum: 715494248752557eb0b718f2a4dd34c9 

bye,

-christian-

-- 
Christian Hammers WESTEND GmbH  |  Internet-Business-Provider
Technik   CISCO Systems Partner - Authorized Reseller
  Lütticher Straße 10  Tel 0241/701333-11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]D-52064 Aachen  Fax 0241/911879




Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS in Squid -- any progress?

2005-04-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Christian Hammers wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:56:38PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
   Are there any news regarding the vulnerability status of the Woody
   package or the preparation of a DSA?
  
  Luigi is taking a look.  It's not yet clear whether this problem even
  exists in woody.  Sid and sarge are fine.  If you are able to fix the
  package in woody, that would help a lot.
 
 Mandriva has fixed the bug in 2.4.STABLE7 (we have 2.4.STABLE6 in Woody)
 and released an advisory today:
 
   http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:078
 
 Sadly I was just not able to find the following soruce package which
 probably includes the patch. Does anybody know where they hide their
 download server?
 
   corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm
   md5sum: 715494248752557eb0b718f2a4dd34c9 

ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/mandrake/official/updates/corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm

Regards,

Joey

-- 
There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS in Squid -- any progress?

2005-04-29 Thread Luigi Gangitano
corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm
md5sum: 715494248752557eb0b718f2a4dd34c9
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/mandrake/official/updates/corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm
Great! They didn't fix it (no post patch in it) and added the setcookie 
patch
that is not needed prior to 2.5.STABLE7.
Still looking for a proof o concept to test the woody package.
Regards,
L

This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS in Squid -- any progress?

2005-04-29 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello

On 2005-04-29 Luigi Gangitano wrote:
 corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm
 md5sum: 715494248752557eb0b718f2a4dd34c9
 
  ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/mandrake/official/updates/corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm
 
 Great! They didn't fix it (no post patch in it) and added the setcookie
 patch that is not needed prior to 2.5.STABLE7.
 
 Still looking for a proof o concept to test the woody package.

I found the following sentence in the last changelog entry of the Mandriva
package and think it's interesting for those watching this bug:

  * Wed Apr 27 2005 Stew Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk
- CAN-2005-0718 - patch not relevant, segfault occurs in an unprotected
  call to clientProcessBody, which isn't used in 2.4.STABLE7

In this case I can sleep better although it would be nice if you could get
this confirmed by the Squid developers. If you kindly ask they will probably
even test their PoC exploit against a Debian server even if they do not want
to release it to the public.

bye,

-christian-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]