Bug#308952: (fwd) Re: (fwd) Bug#308952: tetex-extra: please add the astrosym fonts

2005-06-13 Thread Hilmar Preusse 
tags 308952 + fixed-upstream
stop

- Forwarded message from Thomas Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Thomas Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (fwd) Bug#308952: tetex-extra: please add the astrosym fonts
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:20:02 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

 Down here in the DBTS we've got the request to include the astrosym
 fonts^1 into teTeX. Please consider to do so.

Ok, just added.

Thanks,

Thomas

- End forwarded message -

-- 
sigmentation fault


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308952: tetex-extra: please add the astrosym fonts

2005-05-17 Thread Hilmar Preusse 
On 13.05.05 maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Hi,

 these fonts are usefull for astronomical purpose as they include
 the astronomical symbols.
 
 the license is said to be lppl. no idea if that's good enough for
 inclusion.
 
It is. LPPL = 1.3 is considered to be free according to the DFSG.
We'll forward that bug to upstream, if it is not yet included in
teTeX 3.0.

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308952: tetex-extra: please add the astrosym fonts

2005-05-13 Thread maximilian attems 
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.2c-7
Severity: wishlist

these fonts are usefull for astronomical purpose as they
include the astronomical symbols.

the license is said to be lppl.
no idea if that's good enough for inclusion.

thanks for your work.
maks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]