Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
severity minor 308968 thanks Caspar Bothmer wrote: Caspar Bothmer schrieb: But I think we should stop here or discuss this further privately. One last thing -- tonight (june 03 2005) two new localisation packages for mozilla-firefox were accepted into sarge... I reconsidered this. This is the bug about the confusing message that pops up, if you try to use enigmail without a locale package (as the original reporter mentioned) This is not the bug asking for an enigmail locale package. The bug concerning that issue is: 311561. So setting severity to minor since it is just a confusing message. I will try to reproduce and forward to upstream. ASAP. Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
Now that the freeze in sarge is really hard I don't feel good about uploading a completely new package to the debian archives. It won't be a /completely/ new package, it would be the addon for another package, namely mozilla-locale-de-at. There is just no formal dependency on enigmail-locale-de... I hope you understand that. I understand that you don't feel good about that, you'd be in the spotlight. On the other side -- the worst that could happen is that your request would be denied. caspar signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
Alexander Sack schrieb: ... that's not the way it works. They are completely different packages. Sure, they are separate packages without any connection despite enigmail-locale-de depending on mozilla-locale-de-at to be installed. But this dependency doesn't change anything here. What I meant with not /completely/ different was that an enigmail-enhanced mozilla needs both packages to be localized and therefore these packages are somewhat connected to each other. I just tried to emphasize this aspect and downplay the other :-)) If you want the enigmail translations to be included in the mozilla-locale-de-at No. Why that? I don't get it. What are you talking about? Never mind -- I was just trying to tell you that you are responsible for the package and that I understand its implications. But I still don't see any harm in trying it. But I think we should stop here or discuss this further privately. caspar signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
Caspar Bothmer schrieb: But I think we should stop here or discuss this further privately. One last thing -- tonight (june 03 2005) two new localisation packages for mozilla-firefox were accepted into sarge... caspar signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
Caspar Bothmer wrote: Ok, mozilla-locale-de-at will find its way into sarge. So I will have the following situation: Debian could easily provide an enigmail-enhanced _and_ localized mozilla but I have to choose between an enigmail-enhanced or a localized mozilla. Your package is ready as you said. So why don't you give it a try? For those desparately looking for a locale package, look here: http://www.asoftsite.org/enigmail_locales.html -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
Alexander Sack schrieb: Caspar Bothmer wrote: Your package is ready as you said. So why don't you give it a try? For those desparately looking for a locale package, look here: http://www.asoftsite.org/enigmail_locales.html You didn't get my intention. I do not *need* /your/ package to use a german locale with /my/ enigmail-enhanced mozilla. My problem is that sarge will ship with a mozilla package one could enhance either with a locale or with enigmail but not both. If enigmail is a must -- and for me it definitely is -- one gets a half-baked mozilla. That is a starting point but at the end I need to produce a smaller or bigger subdistro to get things completed. And this is ridiculous. Even more if you tell me that the packages are there. caspar signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
severity 308968 grave If I understand the severities right, grave is 'makes the package in question unusable or mostly so ..'. OK. No De-localization makes the package unusable (at least for my users :-). They won't even be able to read or understand the error message 'The language of Enigmail does not correspond to the language of your application! Enigmail can therefore NOT work.'. I'm not sure, wether enigmail then actually refuses to do anything or wether it will work (albeit with an english user interface). Regardless: It makes no difference. An application, whose dialogs cannot be understood by the users might as well be considered as not working for all practical purposes. I'd be really, really thankful to the maintainers, if the localization package found it's way into sarge. Thanks for your work, guys (and please make it available :-). Regards -- markus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
Markus E Leypold schrieb: I'd be really, really thankful to the maintainers, if the localization package found it's way into sarge. Thanks for your work, guys (and please make it available :-). And I join in. It's worth it. caspar signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#308968: severity 308968 grave
Ok, mozilla-locale-de-at will find its way into sarge. So I will have the following situation: Debian could easily provide an enigmail-enhanced _and_ localized mozilla but I have to choose between an enigmail-enhanced or a localized mozilla. Your package is ready as you said. So why don't you give it a try? caspar signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
