Bug#313570: can you get rid of your build-dependency on cons?
* H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-14 21:18]: #206100 is the WNPP bug. Feel free to adopt it if it's still maintained upstream. Unfortunately, upstream has been inactive for a while now. I was involved in an effort to try to rework it, but that kinda didn't really go anywhere. Nevertheless, I am still interested in maintaining it, even if it just means keeping the Debian packaging up to date. Go ahead then. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313570: can you get rid of your build-dependency on cons?
Package: atom4 Version: 4.1-1 Severity: important Your package is the only one which still has a build-dependency on cons. cons has been orphaned since August 2003 (665 days ago) so it seems unlikely that it will be adopted soon. Since I intend to remove cons from the archive, it would be good if you could replace this build-dependency soon. Do you think that's possible? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313570: can you get rid of your build-dependency on cons?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:25:12PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Package: atom4 Version: 4.1-1 Severity: important Your package is the only one which still has a build-dependency on cons. cons has been orphaned since August 2003 (665 days ago) so it seems unlikely that it will be adopted soon. Since I intend to remove cons from the archive, it would be good if you could replace this build-dependency soon. Do you think that's possible? [...] Hmm. Is there any technical reason cons is being orphaned? If nobody wants to maintain it, I will adopt it (I use Cons a lot for my personal projects). T -- Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue. -- Yoon Ha Lee, CONLANG -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313570: can you get rid of your build-dependency on cons?
* H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-14 10:55]: Do you think that's possible? [...] Hmm. Is there any technical reason cons is being orphaned? If nobody I don't think so. wants to maintain it, I will adopt it (I use Cons a lot for my #206100 is the WNPP bug. Feel free to adopt it if it's still maintained upstream. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313570: can you get rid of your build-dependency on cons?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:01:53AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-14 10:55]: Do you think that's possible? [...] Hmm. Is there any technical reason cons is being orphaned? If nobody I don't think so. wants to maintain it, I will adopt it (I use Cons a lot for my #206100 is the WNPP bug. Feel free to adopt it if it's still maintained upstream. Unfortunately, upstream has been inactive for a while now. I was involved in an effort to try to rework it, but that kinda didn't really go anywhere. Nevertheless, I am still interested in maintaining it, even if it just means keeping the Debian packaging up to date. T -- Bare foot: (n.) A device for locating thumb tacks on the floor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
