Bug#316779: zlib: FTBFS on amd64: No rule to make target `binary-lib32z1', needed by `binary-arch'.
Package: zlib Version: 1:1.2.2-5 Severity: important Hi, Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: dpkg-deb: building package `zlib-bin' in `../zlib-bin_1.2.2-5_amd64.deb'. make: *** No rule to make target `binary-lib32z1', needed by `binary-arch'. There doesn't appear to be such a target, and I think the same is lacking for the 64 bit versions. PS: It has post-binary-lib34z1, which probably is a typo, changing that to post-binary-lib32z1 doesn't fix it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316779: zlib: FTBFS on amd64: No rule to make target `binary-lib32z1', needed by `binary-arch'.
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 10:47:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > PS: It has post-binary-lib34z1, which probably is a typo, > changing that to post-binary-lib32z1 doesn't fix it. It might be helpful if you could share the output from the build with me... Unfortunately I have to work on this blind since I don't have access to an amd64 machine with the appropriate tools to do test builds. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316779: zlib: FTBFS on amd64: No rule to make target `binary-lib32z1', needed by `binary-arch'.
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 10:47:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > There doesn't appear to be such a target, and I think the same is > lacking for the 64 bit versions. Nope, everything's there for 64 bit (some of the rules are implicit). -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316779: zlib: FTBFS on amd64: No rule to make target `binary-lib32z1', needed by `binary-arch'.
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 10:18:53AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 10:47:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > PS: It has post-binary-lib34z1, which probably is a typo, > > changing that to post-binary-lib32z1 doesn't fix it. > > It might be helpful if you could share the output from the build with me... I'm sorry, I should have added the url to the buildd log: http://amd64.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=zlib&ver=1%3A1.2.2-5&arch=amd64&stamp=1120422546&file=log&as=raw > Unfortunately I have to work on this blind since I don't have access to > an amd64 machine with the appropriate tools to do test builds. You should be able to get access on ravel.hpc2n.umu.se, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know what the state of the other public box pergolesi.debian.org is. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316779: zlib: FTBFS on amd64: No rule to make target `binary-lib32z1', needed by `binary-arch'.
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:33:47PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I'm sorry, I should have added the url to the buildd log: Do you have one for the case where the trivial fix (34->32) has been tried? That's more interesting... > You should be able to get access on ravel.hpc2n.umu.se, contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I should already have a login on another system but due to use of GPG to mail me the account details I can't check that yet (I also can't work on this until then anyway). > I don't know what the state of the other public box > pergolesi.debian.org is. It works fine but doesn't have all the build deps I need on it (I've asked for them but they've not been added yet). -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
