Bug#319386: strange version number

2005-07-23 Thread Harald Dunkel 
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Err, the version number may be strange, but why is this a bug
  in fvwm? The package still performs OK, does it not?
 

The BTS is used to report all kinds of problems with
the package, not just pure functionality bugs.

I am running my own fvwm package for several years, following
the upstream version number, as usual. The broken version
number of the fvwm package on the official server makes it
look newer until there is a real upstream version 2.5.130.


Regards

Harri


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#319386: strange version number

2005-07-21 Thread Harald Dunkel 
Package: fvwm
Version: 2.5.130.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1

Please excuse if I am wrong, but is there a typo in the
version number? It should be something like

2.5.13-0.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1

AFAIK. There is no 2.5.130 upstream yet.

Would it be possible to fix this?


Many thanx

Harri


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature