Bug#320187: latex2html and teTeX-3.0

2005-08-11 Thread Frank Küster
Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Frank,

 Frank Küster wrote:
 we are planning to upload teTeX-3.0 (which is currently in experimental)
 to unstable at the end of this month.  After that, latex2html will have
 problems with parts of the tex file that it passes on to LaTeX itself.

 OK, I'm just now looking into that. :)

 I have not tested it, but it may cause packages that Build-Depend on
 latex2html to FTBFS.

 By the way, there's no package build-depending on latex2html in Debian,
 only one in non-free.

Good news then.

Have fun,
Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#320187: latex2html and teTeX-3.0

2005-08-10 Thread Frank Küster
tags 320187 patch
stop

Hi Roland,

we are planning to upload teTeX-3.0 (which is currently in experimental)
to unstable at the end of this month.  After that, latex2html will have
problems with parts of the tex file that it passes on to LaTeX itself.
I have not tested it, but it may cause packages that Build-Depend on
latex2html to FTBFS.

Do you have any plans to fix this soon?  Note that there are two patches
in the link in the first mail to this bug.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#320187: latex2html and teTeX-3.0

2005-08-10 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi Frank,

Frank Küster wrote:
 we are planning to upload teTeX-3.0 (which is currently in experimental)
 to unstable at the end of this month.  After that, latex2html will have
 problems with parts of the tex file that it passes on to LaTeX itself.

OK, I'm just now looking into that. :)

 I have not tested it, but it may cause packages that Build-Depend on
 latex2html to FTBFS.

By the way, there's no package build-depending on latex2html in Debian,
only one in non-free.

 Do you have any plans to fix this soon?

Yes, I first needed to bring my Debian packages into a better shape.
latex2html in non-free was unfortunately lower priority, but now, it's
time for that.

 Note that there are two patches in the link in the first mail to this bug.

Thanks for the reminder.

bye,
  Roland