Bug#327151: missing dependency on devscripts

2005-11-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I suggest that the following be applied.  This removes the devscripts
dependency altogether, as it's not needed.

diff -Nru /tmp/BKSAoZWDbV/cdbs-0.4.32/scripts/cdbs-edit-patch 
/tmp/15PktvE0NM/cdbs-0.4.33/scripts/cdbs-edit-patch
--- /tmp/BKSAoZWDbV/cdbs-0.4.32/scripts/cdbs-edit-patch 2005-04-20 
14:01:34.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/15PktvE0NM/cdbs-0.4.33/scripts/cdbs-edit-patch 2005-11-30 
00:02:24.0 +0100
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 # create clean source package in temporary dir
 cp -a . $TMP/$ORIGDIR
 cd $TMP/$ORIGDIR
-debclean
+debian/rules clean

 # create an empty patch if necessary so that the following loop stops at the
 # lexicographic patch position


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#327151: missing dependency on devscripts

2005-09-09 Thread Duck

severity 327151 normal
thanks


Vorlon is right, this script is optionnal, or even extra-optionnal, and
thus adding a Suggests line would be sufficient.

-- 
Marc Dequènes (Duck)


pgpn32GunNytq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#327151: missing dependency on devscripts

2005-09-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.32
Severity: serious
Justification: violation of release policy (clause 2)

The command cdbs-edit-patch requires the command debclean to operate, which is 
in
package devscripts, but there is no dependency or other relationship declared to
that package.

I think it may be simpler to peek into what dpatch-edit-patch does.  AFAICT, it
doesn't need debclean, probably calls debian/rules clean directly.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#327151: missing dependency on devscripts

2005-09-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:12:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
 Package: cdbs
 Version: 0.4.32
 Severity: serious
 Justification: violation of release policy (clause 2)

 The command cdbs-edit-patch requires the command debclean to operate, which
 is in package devscripts, but there is no dependency or other
 relationship declared to that package.

Strictly speaking, opportunistic dependencies are allowed; if a package
includes optional utilities that are not required for the main purpose
of the package, it is generally considered acceptable to not list the
dependencies of those optional utilities.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature