Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k

2005-09-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

Script started on Mon Sep 12 08:22:21 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /home/wouter~$ cat foo.c
int main() {
;
return 0;
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

Since this is exactly what configure-scripts try to compile to see
whether the C compiler works, nothing will compile on m68k anymore.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: m68k
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-mvme16x
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 depends on:
ii  binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.0  4.0.1-6 The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.0-base 4.0.1-6 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc2  4.0.1-6 GCC support library

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn  libmudflap0-dev   none (no description available)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k

2005-09-12 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 327780 m68k
thanks

that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on
another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So
why not file it for libc6?

The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask,
if it's time to drop m68k from the release architectures or just set
the severity of all m68k reports to wishlist. There's currently nobody
interested in forwarding m68k related bug reports upstream and testing
m68k compiler versions. There are at least six more unhandled m68k
reports.

My email from July 
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/07/msg00069.html)
is left unanswered, so I have to assume, that m68k isn't supported
anymore and will start to downgrade all m68k related reports to a
non-RC severity.

  Matthias

Wouter Verhelst writes:
 Package: gcc-4.0
 Version: 4.0.1-6
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 Hi,
 
 Script started on Mon Sep 12 08:22:21 2005
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /home/wouter~$ cat foo.c
 int main() {
 ;
 return 0;
 }
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
 Segmentation fault
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
 
 Since this is exactly what configure-scripts try to compile to see
 whether the C compiler works, nothing will compile on m68k anymore.
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: testing/unstable
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
 Architecture: m68k
 Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
 Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-mvme16x
 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
 
 Versions of packages gcc-4.0 depends on:
 ii  binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 The GNU assembler, linker and 
 bina
 ii  cpp-4.0  4.0.1-6 The GNU C preprocessor
 ii  gcc-4.0-base 4.0.1-6 The GNU Compiler Collection 
 (base 
 ii  libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
 an
 ii  libgcc2  4.0.1-6 GCC support library
 
 Versions of packages gcc-4.0 recommends:
 ii  libc6-dev 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Development 
 Librari
 pn  libmudflap0-dev   none (no description available)
 
 -- no debconf information
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k

2005-09-12 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:28:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:

 that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on
 another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So
 why not file it for libc6?

What cpu type is that other machine? I assume that ska is a 040?
 
 The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask,
 if it's time to drop m68k from the release architectures or just set
 the severity of all m68k reports to wishlist. There's currently nobody
 interested in forwarding m68k related bug reports upstream and testing
 m68k compiler versions. There are at least six more unhandled m68k
 reports.
 My email from July 
 (http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/07/msg00069.html)
 is left unanswered, so I have to assume, that m68k isn't supported
 anymore and will start to downgrade all m68k related reports to a
 non-RC severity.

Uhm? Unanswered? I thought Wouter and Adam step up to fill the gap?

-- 
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature