Bug#333104: kbanking
Hi Mark, Micha, Release gurus, first, my apologies for not following up on the Mark's ITP which I overlooked... As you may or may not know, the kbanking library as introduced to Debian/unstable in October is obsolete and is probably (on the way to being) at least partially unusable since about August when upstream integrated kbanking into AqBanking (packaged as libaqbanking). Wishlist bug #333104 also asks for libkbanking to be provided by libaqbanking, which is IMHO the way to go. So I'd like to know: - Mark, would you mind if libaqbanking provided libkbanking1? - Release team: kmymoney2 has already been mentioned to be tying gnucash to kde. Is my impression that an update of libaqbanking introducing libkbanking1 (and a build-dependency on kdelibs4-dev) is disruptive to the testing migration? If and when Mark and the release team give their OK, I'd upload aqbanking with kbanking today. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333104: kbanking
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Release team: kmymoney2 has already been mentioned to be tying gnucash to kde. Is my impression that an update of libaqbanking introducing libkbanking1 (and a build-dependency on kdelibs4-dev) is disruptive to the testing migration? Thomas, I know you know this, but other readers might not, and it might help the release managers decide the right answer to your question: The gnucash in testing and unstable currently is not linked against libaqbanking. I plan to link gnucash against aqbanking only *after* the current unstable version migrates into testing. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333104: kbanking
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:02:56AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Release team: kmymoney2 has already been mentioned to be tying gnucash to kde. Is my impression that an update of libaqbanking introducing libkbanking1 (and a build-dependency on kdelibs4-dev) is disruptive to the testing migration? Thomas, I know you know this, but other readers might not, and it might help the release managers decide the right answer to your question: The gnucash in testing and unstable currently is not linked against libaqbanking. I plan to link gnucash against aqbanking only *after* the current unstable version migrates into testing. True, but libaqbanking is currently in testing and is tied to both the libofx and qt-x11-free transitions, so it's part of this mess today. Since nothing else in testing depends on libaqbanking, though, I've already decided to pull libaqbanking from testing temporarily when the time comes in order to avoid having to get gnucash and KDE into testing at the same time. So in light of that, there's no reason to hold off on uploading libaqbanking. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#333104: kbanking
On Thursday 20 October 2005 08:50, Thomas Viehmann wrote: first, my apologies for not following up on the Mark's ITP which I overlooked... I became aware after I had built kbanking, also I wasn't aware how soon the aqbanking direct support for kbanking was going to be, so I uploaded kbanking. As you may or may not know, the kbanking library as introduced to Debian/unstable in October is obsolete and is probably (on the way to being) at least partially unusable since about August when upstream integrated kbanking into AqBanking (packaged as libaqbanking). It actually still works and I have had reports that kmymoney2 supports HBCI with kbanking and aqbanking as seperate packages, but I agree they should be provided from aqbanking now. My one query is Does kmymoney2 build with kbanking from aqbanking? Do you have some test debs I can look into? Wishlist bug #333104 also asks for libkbanking to be provided by libaqbanking, which is IMHO the way to go. Agreed. So I'd like to know: - Mark, would you mind if libaqbanking provided libkbanking1? I am happy for libaqbanking to provide libkbanking1, provided kmymoney2 will build. I'm unsure if you will need to use some special Replaces: Conflicts: headers because we are effectivly merging two upstream sources. - Release team: kmymoney2 has already been mentioned to be tying gnucash to kde. Is my impression that an update of libaqbanking introducing libkbanking1 (and a build-dependency on kdelibs4-dev) is disruptive to the testing migration? I wasn't aware of this problem. I see that kmymoney2 is being removed from testing today :-( If and when Mark and the release team give their OK, I'd upload aqbanking with kbanking today. When you upload aqbanking with kbanking, I'll upload kmymoney2 with kbanking support! Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333104: kbanking
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 06:12:32PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote: - Release team: kmymoney2 has already been mentioned to be tying gnucash to kde. Is my impression that an update of libaqbanking introducing libkbanking1 (and a build-dependency on kdelibs4-dev) is disruptive to the testing migration? I wasn't aware of this problem. I see that kmymoney2 is being removed from testing today :-( Yes, it's a temporary removal for purely logistical reasons -- removing kmymoney2 from testing while the transition completes is a better option than either leaving an uninstallable kmymoney2 in testing, or allowing the transition to continue to be delayed indefinitely (as is otherwise likely without the use of some force to keep maintainers from uploading packages to unstable...) Barring any new uploads of kmymoney2 that would introduce new dependencies, the package should get back into testing just fine when the rest of KDE makes the transition. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#333104: kbanking
Hello Mark and Thomas, Mark Purcell schrieb: My one query is Does kmymoney2 build with kbanking from aqbanking? Do you have some test debs I can look into? The packages I've build and checked in to svn.debian.org are available under http://aqbanking.alioth.debian.org/unstable/ So I'd like to know: - Mark, would you mind if libaqbanking provided libkbanking1? I am happy for libaqbanking to provide libkbanking1, provided kmymoney2 will build. I've tried to build kmymoney2 (release version 0.8) with the libkbanking1-package I've build from AqBanking source. The build succeded, but I've not been able to use kmymoney2 with my already configured AqBanking accounts since the context menu entry for connecting KMyMoney2 accounts to AqBanking accounts is disabled. I haven't had enough time yet for figuring out whether this was my fault or not... Mark, I would appreciate it if you could test whether the packages are ready for use with KMyMoney2... I'm unsure if you will need to use some special Replaces: Conflicts: headers because we are effectivly merging two upstream sources. Hmm, I don't know either, but since the packagename remains the same I think it might suffice to ask ftp-master (?) to remove all libkbanking packages from the Debian archives and upload the new AqBanking packages providing the additional package libkbanking1. If and when Mark and the release team give their OK, I'd upload aqbanking with kbanking today. Thomas, if you agree with the changes (have a look at the SVN changelogs) I've made in the packages mentioned above, and if Mark has no objections please upload them. :) Yours Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
