Bug#335847: lilypond-data: n

2005-10-26 Thread Damien Cirotteau
Package: lilypond-data
Version: 2.6.3-9
Severity: normal


lilypond-data needs /usr/bin/psewhich to be desinstalled. Howevere the
package doesn't explicitely depends on it. I happen to desinstall
tetex-bin which didn't desinstall lilypond-data. I now can't remove
lilypond-data. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-multimedia-386
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages lilypond-data depends on:
pn  texinfo | texlive-texinfo none (no description available)

Versions of packages lilypond-data recommends:
pn  lilypond  none (no description available)

-- no debconf information





___ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#335847: lilypond-data: n

2005-10-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Damien Cirotteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Package: lilypond-data
 Version: 2.6.3-9
 Severity: normal

 lilypond-data needs /usr/bin/psewhich to be desinstalled. 

What does this mean?  Can you please be more specific?

 Howevere the
 package doesn't explicitely depends on it. I happen to desinstall
 tetex-bin which didn't desinstall lilypond-data. 

Why did you do that?

 I now can't remove lilypond-data.

Can you be more specific?  What happens when you try?






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#335847: lilypond-data: n

2005-10-26 Thread Damien Cirotteau
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:37:15AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote :
 Damien Cirotteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Package: lilypond-data
  Version: 2.6.3-9
  Severity: normal
 
  lilypond-data needs /usr/bin/psewhich to be desinstalled. 
 
 What does this mean?  Can you please be more specific?

Sorry  my fault, I meant  /usr/bin/kpsewhich (the standalone path lookup
for kpathsea). I don't know exactly what is it for but it is part of the
tetex-bin package.  I  didn't  keep the logs.When I tried  to remove
lilypond-data, I had dpkg issuing an error saying that /usr/bin/kpsewich
was not  present on the   system and exiting.   I  therefore deduce that
lilypond needs kpsewhich to be desinstalled.

 
  Howevere the
  package doesn't explicitely depends on it. I happen to desinstall
  tetex-bin which didn't desinstall lilypond-data. 
 
 Why did you do that?

Why one couldn't  do that? The question is  not removing it or not.  The
question  is  if  you   happen toremove tetex-bin(with  apt  not
manually). Then lilypond-data is no more uninstallable.

But to come back to your  question I add to uninstall  all my tex system
on my machine because of some upgrade complications. I was very in hurry
and  the quickest thing  that I  find was to   uninstall and reinstall a
clean version of tetex  (the problem was with the  font maps being moved
in an other  location (namely under /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map). The old
location  was not removed (can't remember  the  exact location) and this
was messing. To be more precise I has errors of this type:

!!! ERROR: The right location for map files has been
changed for this release and the map file `dvips35.map' has
not been found in the right location, but in the obsolete
location
  /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/dvips35.map
instead.

To fix this, please move this file into an appropriate
subdirectory of fonts/map in one of your texmf trees. If 
the file has been installed by a Debian package, please do
not move it. Instead, please report a bug against that package,
and send a copy of that bug to 

debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org

For more information about the changed search paths, see
the release notes section in the teTeX manual. You probably
can read this document by executing the command
  texdoc TETEXDOC
else visit the web page
  http://tug.org/texlive/mapenc.html

and this for ~10 maps. As explained before, I was in hurry, didn't want
to mess my system by hand and I thought that the easiest thing to do was
a fresh install.


 
  I now can't remove lilypond-data.
 
 Can you be more specific?  What happens when you try?

As explained before, dpkg is looking  for /usr/bin/kpsewhich, don't find
it and exit (sorry again I don't have the logs).

BTW, this was just for the bug report. I don't need  support as I manage
to uninstall  lilypond-data (reinstalling  tetex-bin  after removing  by
hand the faulty maps).


Best and thank you for your work,
damien





___ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#335847: lilypond-data: n

2005-10-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG

Thanks for the further explanation; I understand the situation now.

Damien Cirotteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Howevere the
  package doesn't explicitely depends on it. I happen to desinstall
  tetex-bin which didn't desinstall lilypond-data. 
 
 Why did you do that?

 Why one couldn't  do that? The question is  not removing it or not.  The
 question  is  if  you   happen toremove tetex-bin(with  apt  not
 manually). Then lilypond-data is no more uninstallable.

I see.  This means that lilypond-data requires tetex-bin; that's a
real bug which I'll fix on the next upload.

 But to come back to your  question I add to uninstall  all my tex system
 on my machine because of some upgrade complications. I was very in hurry
 and  the quickest thing  that I  find was to   uninstall and reinstall a
 clean version of tetex  (the problem was with the  font maps being moved
 in an other  location (namely under /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map). The old
 location  was not removed (can't remember  the  exact location) and this
 was messing. 

 BTW, this was just for the bug report. I don't need  support as I manage
 to uninstall  lilypond-data (reinstalling  tetex-bin  after removing  by
 hand the faulty maps).

Ok, so if you want to uninstall lilypond-data, you'll need to install
tetex-bin first; there should have been a dependency of lilypond-data
on tetex-bin.  Then it would have refused to let you delete tetex-bin
until after you removed lilypond-data.

Thomas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]