Bug#339359: openoffice.org: Missing fonts (including Helvetica) after upgrade to 2.0.4

2010-06-28 Thread Paul Menzel
found 339359 1:3.2.1-3
quit

Am Sonntag, den 12.11.2006, 17:12 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:

[…]

 Ok, here are my questions for this problem. (If for some answers there
 exists documentation on the net, please point me to it, since I do not
 want to waste your time any further.)
 
 1. a) Why is for example Times New Roman shown and Helvetica is not?

As Vincent pointed out in his reply [1] – I did not get being not
subscribed to the report –, it is Times that is missing and not Times
New Roman. Helvetica is still missing.

b) Why is OOo.org unable to display Helvetica correctly and needs
 substitution?
 
 2. Why does Helvetica show up in other programs font selector list (for
 example The GIMP)?

I checked again and current GIMP (2.6.8-3) does not display the missing
fonts either anymore.

So it looks like it is a problem with some font system. I compared gimp
and openoffice.org-core and they both depend on libfreetype6.

I could not find out what package installs the fonts Times and Helvetica
`xlsfonts` lists. Searching the Web I could not find it either. Could
anyone help, please?

 3. Why is it available again, when you export it to PDF?
 
 4. Do you know if this is the same case under M$ Windows?
 
 5. Is Nimbus Sans L available under M$ Office?
 
 6. Where can I figure out how OOo is substituting fonts?
 
 7. As in the middle, why is there a bigger line spacing, when no font
 substitutions are set up?
 
 Maybe a summary of those answers could be included in REAMDE.Debian .


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339359#51


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#339359: openoffice.org: Missing fonts (including Helvetica) after upgrade to 2.0.4

2006-11-12 Thread Paul Menzel
Hi,


after I had almost finished this reply, I figured out how stupid I have
been and I already say sorry for this. (Tut mir echt Leid.)

I still have a question concerning this topic, so if you are in a hurry
and do not want to read my excuses and what I did wrong, just jump right
to the end.

I think the main fault was, that I did not reload the document. Not
seeing any difference, I was confused why I should replace Nimbus Sans L
by Helvetica and not the other way round. So I also added to replace
Helvetica by Nimbus Sans L. After restarting OOo, that setting made all
useless (something like a loop) and nothing had changed.

Writing this response, I tried it again and I figured it out. Now follow
my tests, which worked this time.


Am Samstag, den 11.11.2006, 23:28 +0100 schrieb Joo Martin: 
 
 Am Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:33:36 +0100 schrieb
 Paul Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  I tried your instructions, but unfortunately the document set with
  Helvetica font and then Nimbus Sans L is still to large (before it
  covered one page, now also a bit of a second one).
 
 Please make following tests and controlling above PDF:
 a) Helvetica in document = export as PDF = test fonts with pdffonts
= in my OOo2 I have the font NimbusSansL-Regu in the PDF

$ ls -l test.odt
-rw-r--r-- 1 name name  74705 2006-11-12 13:48 test.odt
-rw-r--r-- 1 name name 221987 2006-11-12 13:54 test.pdf

$ pdffonts neubew-mit-Passfoto.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
  --- --- --- -
NimbusSanL-Bold  Type 1   yes no  yes 21  0
NimbusSanL-Bold  Type 1   yes no  yes 24  0
NimbusSanL-Regu  Type 1   yes no  yes 13  0
NimbusSanL-Regu  Type 1   yes no  yes 16  0

(Ok, some more informations: When I open the document in oowriter the
font selector list (Schriftart) shows Helvetica. Marking some text and
changing the font to Nimbus Sans L does not change anything.)

 b) Define substition table as written in my email before
 c) Helvetica in document = export as PDF = test fonts with pdffonts
= in my OOo2 I have the font Helvetica in the PDF

$ ls -l test2.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 name name 18923 2006-11-12 14:27 test2.pdf
$ pdffonts test2.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
  --- --- --- -
Helvetica-Bold   Type 1   no  no  no   9  0
HelveticaType 1   no  no  no  10  0


Great, sorry for not testing this before.

 What do you will say with Nimbus Sans L is still to large ?

Ok, I compared a print-out from half a year ago. There everything fits
on one page. Now my father said, he did not change anything in the
document and opened it some weeks ago. Now the end of the text is on a
second page. I compared those two and it looks like the line
spacing (Zeilenabstand) is bigger than before. It is set to 0 in the
paragraph option (Absatz) menu. That is the reason it is needing more
room.

Figuring out the one above, it looks like that, if no font substitutions
are set up, the line spacing seems to be bigger. Maybe this should be a
separate bug report?

 
  Maybe here are some more informations:
  
  In contrast to the original post, the fonts Times New Roman is shown
  (also the msttcorefonts and Courier). So
  
  1. Could you please check if those fonts are also available to you?
 
 Yes, I have installed all Windows-98 fonts
  
 
  Typing xlsfonts on the console and grepping for helvet or times, the
  fonts are shown. For example:
  
  -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--20-140-100-100-p-98-iso8859-1
  or
  -adobe-times-medium-i-normal--14-140-75-75-p-73-iso8859-1
  
  2. Is that also true in your setup?
 Yes, I have this fonts too, but they will generated with an alias-file
 inside the fonts-path.
 
 
 Now another info for your special wish: You CAN use helvetica fonts, it
 doesn't matter, wether you can see the font in the font-selector-list.
 You could make helvetica fonts visible in the list (only for writer!),
 but it's a little bit tricky and have no relevance / advantage, because
 you need again the fonts-substitution as written in my first email.

Ok, here are my questions for this problem. (If for some answers there
exists documentation on the net, please point me to it, since I do not
want to waste your time any further.)

1. a) Why is for example Times New Roman shown and Helvetica is not?

   b) Why is OOo.org unable to display Helvetica correctly and needs
substitution?

2. Why does Helvetica show up in other programs font selector list (for
example The GIMP)?

3. Why is it available again, when you export it to PDF?

4. Do you know if this is the same case under M$ Windows?

5. Is Nimbus Sans L available under M$ Office?

6. Where can I figure out how OOo is substituting fonts?

Bug#339359: openoffice.org: Missing fonts (including Helvetica) after upgrade to 2.0.4

2006-11-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Sonntag, den 05.11.2006, 22:26 +0100 schrieb Joo Martin:
 Hello Paul,
 
  my father told me today, that the Helvetica font is not available
  in OOo anymore for a week or so.
 
 I had the same problems with the OOo 2.x some months ago and at
 the beginning I have tested some ways to get Helvetica/Times
 Fonts again. 
 
 My best solution now (in german language):
 
 ---
 Extras / Optionen / Openoffice.org / Schriftarten:
 
   xErsetzungstabelle
x _Nimbus Mono L   Courier
x _Nimbus Roman No9 L  Times
x _Nimbus Nimbus Sans LHelvetica
 ---
 
 and I use the Nimbus-Fonts as default fonts. This will say: the
 Nimbus-Fonts are TTF-Fonts as Type1-Fonts-Substitutions of Courier,
 Times, Helvica. Now my Fonts-Design is the same as before and the
 PDF-Export-Files now again very small, because of the substition 
 rules above.

I tried your instructions, but unfortunately the document set with
Helvetica font and then Nimbus Sans L is still to large (before it
covered one page, now also a bit of a second one).

Maybe here are some more informations:

In contrast to the original post, the fonts Times New Roman is shown
(also the msttcorefonts and Courier). So

1. Could you please check if those fonts are also available to you?


Typing xlsfonts on the console and grepping for helvet or times, the
fonts are shown. For example:

-adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--20-140-100-100-p-98-iso8859-1

or

-adobe-times-medium-i-normal--14-140-75-75-p-73-iso8859-1

2. Is that also true in your setup?


On IRC someone suggested that Helvetica is not a free fonts and that is
the reason it is not shown anymore.

3. Has anyone (maybe Rene) more information about this?


Hope we can solve this issue soon.

 Ciao, Joo
 (Germany)

Greetings

Paul


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Bug#339359: openoffice.org: Missing fonts (including Helvetica) after upgrade to 2.0.4

2006-11-11 Thread Joo Martin


Am Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:33:36 +0100 schrieb
Paul Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I tried your instructions, but unfortunately the document set with
 Helvetica font and then Nimbus Sans L is still to large (before it
 covered one page, now also a bit of a second one).

Please make following tests and controlling above PDF:
a) Helvetica in document = export as PDF = test fonts with pdffonts
   = in my OOo2 I have the font NimbusSansL-Regu in the PDF
b) Define substition table as written in my email before
c) Helvetica in document = export as PDF = test fonts with pdffonts
   = in my OOo2 I have the font Helvetica in the PDF

What do you will say with Nimbus Sans L is still to large ?

 
 Maybe here are some more informations:
 
 In contrast to the original post, the fonts Times New Roman is shown
 (also the msttcorefonts and Courier). So
 
 1. Could you please check if those fonts are also available to you?

Yes, I have installed all Windows-98 fonts
 

 Typing xlsfonts on the console and grepping for helvet or times, the
 fonts are shown. For example:
 
 -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--20-140-100-100-p-98-iso8859-1
 or
 -adobe-times-medium-i-normal--14-140-75-75-p-73-iso8859-1
 
 2. Is that also true in your setup?
Yes, I have this fonts too, but they will generated with an alias-file
inside the fonts-path.


Now another info for your special wish: You CAN use helvetica fonts, it
doesn't matter, wether you can see the font in the font-selector-list.
You could make helvetica fonts visible in the list (only for writer!),
but it's a little bit tricky and have no relevance / advantage, because
you need again the fonts-substitution as written in my first email.

Ciao, Joo
(Germany)

 
Get my GPG key from http://www.joomart.de/debian/pub_key.asc





pgpFfzsIVxbWg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#339359: openoffice.org: Missing fonts (including Helvetica) after upgrade to 2.0.4

2006-11-05 Thread Joo Martin
Hello Paul,

 my father told me today, that the Helvetica font is not available
 in OOo anymore for a week or so.

I had the same problems with the OOo 2.x some months ago and at
the beginning I have tested some ways to get Helvetica/Times
Fonts again. 

My best solution now (in german language):

---
Extras / Optionen / Openoffice.org / Schriftarten:

xErsetzungstabelle
 x _Nimbus Mono L   Courier
 x _Nimbus Roman No9 L  Times
 x _Nimbus Nimbus Sans LHelvetica
---

and I use the Nimbus-Fonts as default fonts. This will say: the
Nimbus-Fonts are TTF-Fonts as Type1-Fonts-Substitutions of Courier,
Times, Helvica. Now my Fonts-Design is the same as before and the
PDF-Export-Files now again very small, because of the substition 
rules above.

Ciao, Joo
(Germany)

 
Get my GPG key from http://www.joomart.de/debian/pub_key.asc


pgp8KdKP9cTZC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#339359: openoffice.org: Missing fonts (including Helvetica) after upgrade to 2.0.4

2006-11-01 Thread Paul Menzel
package openoffice.org
found 339359 2.0.4-5
severity 339359 important
# renders package unusable for some users since the layout is different
with different font
stop


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Bug#339359: openoffice.org: Missing fonts (including Helvetica) after upgrade to 2.0.4

2006-10-31 Thread Paul Menzel
Subject: openoffice.org: Missing fonts (including Helvetica) after
upgrade to 2.0.4
Followup-For: Bug #339359
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4-2
Severity: important
stop

*** Please type your report below this line ***

Hi there,

my father told me today, that the Helvetica font is not available in OOo
anymore for a week or so.

As mentioned above, the font is installed for example firefox and gimp
detect them.

Unfortunately I have no clue where to look for the error. Please tell me
if I can help with something.

Thanks,

Paul

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  openoffice.org-base   2.0.4-2OpenOffice.org office suite
- data
ii  openoffice.org-calc   2.0.4-2OpenOffice.org office suite
- spre
ii  openoffice.org-core   2.0.4-2OpenOffice.org office suite
archit
ii  openoffice.org-draw   2.0.4-2OpenOffice.org office suite
- draw
ii  openoffice.org-impress2.0.4-2OpenOffice.org office suite
- pres
ii  openoffice.org-java-common2.0.4-3OpenOffice.org office suite
Java s
ii  openoffice.org-math   2.0.4-2OpenOffice.org office suite
- equa
ii  openoffice.org-writer 2.0.4-2OpenOffice.org office suite
- word

openoffice.org recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil