Bug#342959: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4

2005-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Steve M. Robbins writes:
> Howdy,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:18:29AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
> > We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the
> > g++-3.3 package.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:54:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
> > We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although
> > currently not a hard release goal.
>  
> 
> I completely missed the discussion surrounding removal of gcc 3.3 and
> gcc 3.4.

AFAIK there was none, and I didn't propose this in the bug reports.
Although the release team is eager to minimize the number of versions
for one package.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342959: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4

2005-12-11 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Howdy,

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:18:29AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

> We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the
> g++-3.3 package.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:54:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

> We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although
> currently not a hard release goal.
 

I completely missed the discussion surrounding removal of gcc 3.3 and
gcc 3.4.


For the record, ccmalloc builds a stub library for each C++ compiler
shipped.  So the build-dependency can be easily removed as soon as the
compiler is removed.

Cheers,
-Steve



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]