Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-20 Thread Alexandre Pineau
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:01:48 +0100
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:08:37AM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
 
  Can you send the result of ldd /usr/bin/nedit ?
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
 linux-gate.so.1 =  (0xe000)
 libXp.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0xb7f45000)
 libXm.so.2 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.2 (0xb7d9f000)

At home :

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
linux-gate.so.1 =  (0xe000)
libXp.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0xb7f48000)
libXm.so.2 = /usr/lib/libXm.so.2 (0xb7dcd000)

lessitif is installed in /usr/lib/ ... and open motif in /usr/X11R6/lib/
Can you remove open motif?

Best regards,

Alexandre Pineau



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-20 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:23:06AM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:

   Can you send the result of ldd /usr/bin/nedit ?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
  libXm.so.2 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.2 (0xb7d9f000)
 At home :
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
 libXm.so.2 = /usr/lib/libXm.so.2 (0xb7dcd000)
 lessitif is installed in /usr/lib/ ... and open motif in /usr/X11R6/lib/
 Can you remove open motif?

That fixed it!

irulan:/home/ij# dpkg -S /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.2
dpkg: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.2 not found.

So I removed it. Maybe some cruft from an uninstalled package. 

Nedit now open its window without segfault and works as intended. 
Thx for your help! I think you can close the bug now... 

-- 
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-19 Thread Alexandre Pineau
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:12:33 +0100
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Now I'm not sure whether Sid users are supposed to fix things like
  that themselves. Alexandre?
 
 *When* I would fix this, I would download the debian source, edit the rules
 file and build it against lesstif1, which fixed that problem the last time
 for me. But there's no lesstif1 version installed anymore. I'm using the
 default nedit binary package from ftp.at.debian.org. 

Hello,

Can you send the result of ldd /usr/bin/nedit ?

Best regards,

Alexandre Pineau



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-19 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:08:37AM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:

 Can you send the result of ldd /usr/bin/nedit ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ ldd /usr/bin/nedit
linux-gate.so.1 =  (0xe000)
libXp.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0xb7f45000)
libXm.so.2 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.2 (0xb7d9f000)
libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xb7d91000)
libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0xb7d42000)
libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xb7d39000)
libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xb7d22000)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7c56000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7c31000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7afa000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7af6000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f69000)

-- 
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-18 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 07:41:02PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:

 * Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-17 18:40):
 On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:32:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
  This points to a mismatch in Motif versions.
 Yes, but why?
 Because Sarge/Edge and Sid version are mixed up. Sid comes with
 Lesstif 0.94.4-1, NEdit is compiled against 0.93.94-11.4.

Erm, this laptop was since ever a sid system (well, maybe not in the first
1-3 month, but that's 2 years ago). I can't imagine how I should be able
to mix it up with a sarge/etch version?

 Now I'm not sure whether Sid users are supposed to fix things like
 that themselves. Alexandre?

*When* I would fix this, I would download the debian source, edit the rules
file and build it against lesstif1, which fixed that problem the last time
for me. But there's no lesstif1 version installed anymore. I'm using the
default nedit binary package from ftp.at.debian.org. 

-- 
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-17 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi,

* Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-16 20:32):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit -V
nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking

This points to a mismatch in Motif versions.


   With Motif: 2.1.0 [@(#)GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.94]
(UNTESTED)

This is the same binary I get with Sarge, not one you compiled
yourself. However, your Debian claims to depend on 0.94.4-1, which is
probably the one installed.


So please try to get a clean install of one version of Motif and/or do
a static compile of NEdit


Thorsten
-- 
Getting a thrill out of some stupid quote is a sign of idiocy.
- turmeric


pgpD0z7yt80ql.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-17 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:32:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:

 * Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-16 20:32):
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit -V
 nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
 re-linking
 This points to a mismatch in Motif versions.

Yes, but why?

With Motif: 2.1.0 [@(#)GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.94]
 (UNTESTED)
 This is the same binary I get with Sarge, not one you compiled
 yourself. However, your Debian claims to depend on 0.94.4-1, which is
 probably the one installed.

I'm using sid. My self compiled usually works when I build it against
lesstif1. But the nedit in question is the Debian sid package (which runs on
my PPC without Problems, but segfaults here on my i386 Laptop). 

 So please try to get a clean install of one version of Motif and/or do
 a static compile of NEdit

I dpkg -P nedit lesstif and reinstalled it. Same problem: 

(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/nedit
(no debugging symbols found)
/usr/bin/nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
NEdit: Converting .nedit file to 5.5 version.
To keep, use Preferences - Save Defaults
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7d88544 in XtWidgetToApplicationContext () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb7d88544 in XtWidgetToApplicationContext () from
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
#1  0xb7da0e95 in XtSetValues () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
#2  0xb7db4294 in XtVaSetValues () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
#3  0x080dba17 in ?? ()
#4  0xc758 in ?? ()
#5  0x08175acd in _XmStrings ()
#6  0x082fad88 in ?? ()
#7  0x in ?? ()

I'm using Xorg here. Maybe there's some problem with that or a leftover from
Xfree86?

-- 
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc



Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-17 Thread Thorsten Haude
Moin,

* Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-17 18:40):
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:32:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
 This points to a mismatch in Motif versions.

Yes, but why?

Because Sarge/Edge and Sid version are mixed up. Sid comes with
Lesstif 0.94.4-1, NEdit is compiled against 0.93.94-11.4.

Now I'm not sure whether Sid users are supposed to fix things like
that themselves. Alexandre?


Thorsten
-- 
Rarely do we find people who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking.
There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked
solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.
- Martin Luther King


pgpH0AKbIr1ct.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:49:22PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:

 * Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-13 18:55):
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit
 nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
 re-linking
 NEdit: Converting .nedit file to 5.5 version.
 To keep, use Preferences - Save Defaults
 Segmentation fault
 Please send us the output of 'nedit -V'.

It took some time to get back to the box where this happens... 
Here it is:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit -V
nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
NEdit: Converting .nedit file to 5.5 version.
To keep, use Preferences - Save Defaults
NEdit 5.5
Sep 30, 2004

 Built on: Linux, 486, GNU C
 Built at: Apr 17 2005, 17:38:00
   With Motif: 2.1.0 [@(#)GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.94]
(UNTESTED)
Running Motif: 2.1 [unknown]
   Server: The X.Org Foundation 60802000
   Visual: 24-bit TrueColor (ID 0x22, Default)
   Locale: C

I hope it helps... 

-- 
Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc



Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-14 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi,

* Ingo Juergensmann wrote (2005-12-13 18:55):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit
nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
NEdit: Converting .nedit file to 5.5 version.
To keep, use Preferences - Save Defaults
Segmentation fault

Please send us the output of 'nedit -V'.


Thorsten
-- 
He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even
his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty,
he establishes a precedent which will reach to himself.
- Thomas Paine


pgpZZHuii5nM1.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#343215: nedit segfaults on startup - lesstif problem

2005-12-13 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Package: nedit
Version: 1:5.5-1
Severity: normal


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ nedit
nedit: Symbol XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
NEdit: Converting .nedit file to 5.5 version.
To keep, use Preferences - Save Defaults
Segmentation fault

I get this on my laptop. When I recompile it against lesstif1, it usually
works fine. On other systems it works fine. If you have an idea what might
cause the segfaults, I would appreciate any tip. 

Regards,
Ingo

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages nedit depends on:
ii  lesstif2 1:0.94.4-1  OSF/Motif 2.1 implementation relea
ii  libc62.3.5-8.1   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libice6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxp6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxt6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System client libraries m

nedit recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]