Bug#343465: [Traduc] Bug#343465: Bug#343465: 'install -s -d foo' error message French translation is misleading.
Hy, to let you know this bug has been fixed and the translation delivered to Translation project. Regards. Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : On 05/02/08 at 20:50 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: It's an error message. I agree that the may not be used is misleading (from a french POV ;) A correct translation would me: les options de strip ne peuvent pas être utilisées lors de l'installation d'un répertoire It's getting closer :-) There's only one strip option, -s, so it should be l'option: l'option strip ne peut pas être utilisées lors de l'installation d'un répertoire utilisée* ;)
Bug#343465: [Traduc] Bug#343465: Bug#343465: 'install -s -d foo' error message French translation is misleading.
Hi people, what i don't understand is that the tracker is mentionning version Package: coreutils Version: 6.10-3 ... though on Translation Project it is mentionned 6.9.92: http://translationproject.org/domain/coreutils.html So the question is where is the inconsistency? Tks Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : On 05/02/08 at 20:50 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: It's an error message. I agree that the may not be used is misleading (from a french POV ;) A correct translation would me: les options de strip ne peuvent pas être utilisées lors de l'installation d'un répertoire It's getting closer :-) There's only one strip option, -s, so it should be l'option: l'option strip ne peut pas être utilisées lors de l'installation d'un répertoire utilisée* ;)
Bug#343465: [Traduc] Bug#343465: Bug#343465: 'install -s -d foo' error message French translation is misleading.
kerb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what i don't understand is that the tracker is mentionning version Package: coreutils Version: 6.10-3 ... though on Translation Project it is mentionned 6.9.92: http://translationproject.org/domain/coreutils.html So the question is where is the inconsistency? Thanks for pointing that out. The message I sent announcing coreutils-6.10 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.announce/44 appears not to have been processed, and the TP still lists 6.9.92 as the latest. I did Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], but perhaps, with the switch to translationproject.org, that address no longer works. I'll be sure to send future announcements to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as recommended. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343465: [Traduc] Bug#343465: Bug#343465: 'install -s -d foo' error message French translation is misleading.
Jim Meyering wrote: kerb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what i don't understand is that the tracker is mentionning version Package: coreutils Version: 6.10-3 ... though on Translation Project it is mentionned 6.9.92: http://translationproject.org/domain/coreutils.html So the question is where is the inconsistency? There is none. The 6.9.92 prerelease contains the exact same strings as the final 6.10 release, so there is little point in announcing this final release to the translators, as there is nothing for them to do, and especially since it came just ten days after 6.9.92. If you wish I could now announce 6.10, in the hope to wake up one or two translators. But I don't think this makes much sense, as the translations won't be used until 6.10.90 comes out, which will probably contain a few new or changed strings anyway. Thanks for pointing that out. The message I sent announcing coreutils-6.10 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.announce/44 appears not to have been processed, and the TP still lists 6.9.92 as the latest. I did Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], but perhaps, with the switch to translationproject.org, that address no longer works. The address still works, and will keep on working. Sorry for not responding to your message, which would have said that I wouldn't announce it -- I must have thought that it was clear that zero string changes don't merit a new announcement to the translators. I'll be sure to send future announcements to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as recommended. Thanks. Regards, Benno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343465: [Traduc] Bug#343465: Bug#343465: 'install -s -d foo' error message French translation is misleading.
Benno Schulenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Meyering wrote: kerb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what i don't understand is that the tracker is mentionning version Package: coreutils Version: 6.10-3 ... though on Translation Project it is mentionned 6.9.92: http://translationproject.org/domain/coreutils.html So the question is where is the inconsistency? There is none. The 6.9.92 prerelease contains the exact same strings as the final 6.10 release, so there is little point in announcing this final release to the translators, as there is nothing for them to do, and especially since it came just ten days after 6.9.92. If you wish I could now announce 6.10, in the hope to wake up one or two translators. If it's easy for you to do, that would be nice, if only to avoid future confusion about the perceived inconsistency. Thanks for the quick reply. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343465: [Traduc] Bug#343465: Bug#343465: 'install -s -d foo' error message French translation is misleading.
Jim Meyering wrote: Benno Schulenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you wish I could now announce 6.10, in the hope to wake up one or two translators. If it's easy for you to do, that would be nice, Done. Benno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
