On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:58:38PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > In my experience, Image::Magick provides you with the latest features while > Graphics::Magick is less prone to breakage. In the case of webmagick > that hasn't been updated upstream in the last four years and is > therefore unlikely to require the latest and greatest, I think it still > makes sense to stick with Graphics::Magick.
In that case, I'm simply letting it stay that way -- others can revert it if they feel like it. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
