Bug#345757: darcs not record not showing the number of patch fragments
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:55:38AM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> If you press ? for help, you'll see that pressing 'c' will show you
> ("count") the number of changes.
Right, sorry :-/ I did not check for new options in the last version.
On the other hand, I had looked in the Changelog in case something related
was mentionned, but the one installed on my machine is really out of date
(darcs 1.0.2).
> This is a result of an optimization to allow record to efficiently handle
> massive repositories, in which computing all the changes at once may
> require more memory than is available.
Ok.
> Unfortunately, we don't have logic to figure out whether your repository
> is large or not, so we always delay computation of the entire patch until
> it's necesary.
Of course. Have you considered adding a new preference (which defaults to
"don't display") for this ?
--
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345757: darcs not record not showing the number of patch fragments
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:58:12AM +0100, Boris Yakobowski wrote:
> Since the current version in unstable (the problem does not manifest itself
> with the testing version), darcs record does no longer how many fragment a
> patch is made of, e.g.
>
> $ darcs record
> hunk ./abcd.tex 1
> -\documentclass[orivec]{llncs}
> + \documentclass[orivec]{llncs}
> Shall I record this patch? (1/?) [ynWsfqadjkc], or ? for help:
If you press ? for help, you'll see that pressing 'c' will show you
("count") the number of changes.
This is a result of an optimization to allow record to efficiently handle
massive repositories, in which computing all the changes at once may
require more memory than is available. Unfortunately, we don't have logic
to figure out whether your repository is large or not, so we always delay
computation of the entire patch until it's necesary.
--
David Roundy
http://www.darcs.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345757: darcs not record not showing the number of patch fragments
Package: darcs
Version: 1.0.4-2
Severity: normal
Since the current version in unstable (the problem does not manifest itself
with the testing version), darcs record does no longer how many fragment a
patch is made of, e.g.
$ darcs record
hunk ./abcd.tex 1
-\documentclass[orivec]{llncs}
+ \documentclass[orivec]{llncs}
Shall I record this patch? (1/?) [ynWsfqadjkc], or ? for help:
^
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc1
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages darcs depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcomerr21.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.10-2 common error description library
ii libcurl3 7.15.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii libgmp3c2 4.1.4-11 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation
ii libkrb53 1.4.3-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libreadline5 5.1-5 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-5 SSL shared libraries
ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages darcs recommends:
ii exim4 4.60-1 metapackage to ease exim MTA (v4)
ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-tran 4.60-1 lightweight exim MTA (v4) daemon
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
