Bug#349779: Further Information

2006-11-29 Thread Paul Cager
As I'm interested in BCEL I thought I would do a little further
investigation of this problem.

Of the 3 URLS given above,
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
is the most useful - it identifies the failing line of code in BCEL. The
following URL gives the change made by the BCEL author to fix the problem:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/bcel/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/bcel/generic/LDC_W.java?r1=152856r2=152900

---
jakarta/bcel/trunk/src/java/org/apache/bcel/generic/LDC_W.java  2003/05/23
07:55:36152856
+++
jakarta/bcel/trunk/src/java/org/apache/bcel/generic/LDC_W.java  2004/11/09
20:02:42152900
@@ -84,5 +84,6 @@
 setIndex(bytes.readUnsignedShort());
 // Override just in case it has been changed
 opcode = org.apache.bcel.Constants.LDC_W;
+length = 3;
   }
 }

(This is slightly different from the suggestion made by the AspectJ
developers).

I have verified that this fix has been incorporated in the latest release
of BCEL (5.2), so presumably we could close this bug by packaging the new
upstream release.





Bug#349779: Further Information

2006-11-29 Thread Arnaud Vandyck

On 11/29/06, Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

As I'm interested in BCEL I thought I would do a little further
investigation of this problem.

[...]

I have verified that this fix has been incorporated in the latest release
of BCEL (5.2), so presumably we could close this bug by packaging the new
upstream release.


Thanks for your investigation

--
Arnaud Vandyck


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]