Bug#355843: New driver version in X.org cvs (6.6.0)

2006-04-18 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 the mental interface of
Michel Dänzer told:

> On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 18:51 +0200, Auzanneau Gregory wrote:
> > 
> > A new version of ati driver into cvs solved this bug:
> > http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/
> > 
> > This version can be pushed into sid ?
> 
> Not right now, as it requires xserver-xorg-core 1.1. It might be a good
> idea to package the CVS ati-1-0-branch for sid or at least experimental
> though.

I did that. But it really makes sense for the >R250 users to get the
new r300 drivers. But at the the moment mesa 6.5.0 doesn't build
idirectfb which is confirmed from Brian Paul. You can build the dri
in mesa 6.5.0 with make linux-dri. If one is interested to test a
ati-1-0-branch.deb:

deb http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv binary-powerpc/
deb-src http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv sources/

Please notice to use it at your own risk.

Elimar


-- 
  Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge, 
  not the fountainheads ;-)



Bug#355843: New driver version in X.org cvs (6.6.0)

2006-04-17 Thread Auzanneau Gregory


Hello,

A new version of ati driver into cvs solved this bug:
http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/

This version can be pushed into sid ?


Thank you all for the good work with linux, keep up with it ! :)

--
Auzanneau Grégory
GPG 0x99137BEE




Bug#355843: New driver version in X.org cvs (6.6.0)

2006-04-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 18:51 +0200, Auzanneau Gregory wrote:
> 
> A new version of ati driver into cvs solved this bug:
> http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/
> 
> This version can be pushed into sid ?

Not right now, as it requires xserver-xorg-core 1.1. It might be a good
idea to package the CVS ati-1-0-branch for sid or at least experimental
though.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer