Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:36:44AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 16:43]: > > I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear > > that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the > > responsability to fix them. > > Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd > know that you're blaming the wrong people... I did now have a look at the build failure, and i get : The following packages have unmet dependencies: cdebconf-newt-udeb: Depends: libnewt0.52 but it is not installable E: Broken packages I don't know who is to blame for this, probably the powerpc buildd or something, but this is clearly something of which i am not responsible, since the d-i build-depends are clearly satisfied on my machine, as i run dpkg-checkbuilddeps on the svn checkout, and then apt-get install all missing packages. If there is something on my part to do there, i will willingly do so, but i don't really see how my responsabibility could be engaged in this failure, as the new daily build script don't send me the log mails anymore, and joeyh collects those for monitoring, so anyone could have a look and fix the issues. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 01:27:55PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-28 10:32]: > > > Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd > > > know that you're blaming the wrong people... > > Actually, Frans is blaming me, so ... > > You mean for not taking a look at the build logs from time to time, > and a new installing a package every few months? For accusing me in two different emails that it is my fault the daily build is broken, while he knows perfectly i am currently half a world away. Furthermore, i have a script which daily scans the build-dep of the svn checkout of the d-i tree, and installs the build-dependencies, so it should not cause problems. Also as said, it is a bit difficult to swallow that i am told debian is better off without me, and then being held responsible for the d-i daily builds, don't you think ? Really, i just wanted to be helpful to hsaymal, and orient him to the right place, i may not have checked everything in detail, as i am not really in conditions to do so, but that is no excuse for bashing me in 2 different emails, and is furthermore a behavior very similar to the one i was almost expulsed for, so two weights two measures ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-28 10:32]: > > Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd > > know that you're blaming the wrong people... > Actually, Frans is blaming me, so ... You mean for not taking a look at the build logs from time to time, and a new installing a package every few months? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:36:44AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 16:43]: > > I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear > > that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the > > responsability to fix them. > > Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd > know that you're blaming the wrong people... Actually, Frans is blaming me, so ... Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-28 08:36]: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 16:43]: > > I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear > > that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the > > responsability to fix them. > > Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd > know that you're blaming the wrong people... Or, to make it clearer: that there's nobody to blame. Dependencies in unstable change... just get on with it. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 16:43]: > I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear > that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the > responsability to fix them. Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd know that you're blaming the wrong people... -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:23:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 27 March 2006 00:42, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > > (X-Debbugs-CC to debian-kernel at Sven Luther's request, perhaps this > > should have been filed against initramfs-tools directly) > > This is not an initramfs-tools problem, but the result of powerpc daily > d-i builds, for which Sven himself is responsible, failing for the last > few days. I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the responsability to fix them. Bashing on your porter is fine, but then don't expect them to fix stuff at your whim, and do the job yourself. I hereby officially announce that i won't continue to do the ungratefull job of powerpc d-i porting, i hear the d-i team has plenty of folk to take my place, so they should fix this. And Frans, you are an unfeeling bastard, i personally asked you yesterday to not pick on me like you are doing now, since i was facing another strong crisis with my mother yesterday, and really didn't need such bullshit. It is clear by your action that you have no human decency. Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
fjp> This is not an initramfs-tools problem, but the result of fjp> powerpc daily d-i builds, for which Sven himself is fjp> responsible, failing for the last fjp> few days. Just for the record, I tried d-i rc2 and it worked like a charm (except for a constant set of error windows during detection from 'modprobe -v sbp2') so it certainly seems it is the broken daily build. Thanks, Shyamal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
On Monday 27 March 2006 00:42, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > (X-Debbugs-CC to debian-kernel at Sven Luther's request, perhaps this > should have been filed against initramfs-tools directly) This is not an initramfs-tools problem, but the result of powerpc daily d-i builds, for which Sven himself is responsible, failing for the last few days. pgpabQpJ5kEP0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator
Package: installation-reports Severity: important (X-Debbugs-CC to debian-kernel at Sven Luther's request, perhaps this should have been filed against initramfs-tools directly) INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: powerpc net-inst daily build (March 26, 2006) uname -a: (normally I run 2.6.15-1-powerpc64) Date: March 26, 2006 Method: Boot off CD (Daily Net Inst ISO downloaded on March 26, 2006) Machine: PowerMac7,3 Processor: dual G5, 2Ghz Memory: 512M I can provide lspci, partition map on request Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[E] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] Comments/Problems: The kernel powerpc64 kernel (linux-image-2.6-powerpc64) could not be installed because the initramfs build failed. I'd be happy to help trouble shoot this problem as far as my skills allow, but unfortunately I may not have access to this machine after April 1. The following is the last few lines of /var/log/syslog when the problem is reported Mar 26 19:22:07 preseed: locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc64 usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc-smp not usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc not usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-2.6-powerpc64 usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp not usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-2.6-powerpc not usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel kernel-image-2.6-powerpc not usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel kernel-image-2.6-power4 not usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel kernel-image-2.6-power3 not usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: kernel kernel-image-2.4.27-apus not usable on powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: Found kernels 'linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc64,linux-image-2.6-powerpc64' Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: arch_kernel candidates: linux-image-2.6-powerpc64 Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: arch_kernel: linux-image-2.6-powerpc64 (present) Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: Using kernel 'linux-image-2.6-powerpc64' Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: Setting do_initrd='yes'. Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: Setting link_in_boot='yes'. Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: Possible initramfs generator(s): 'initramfs-tools yaird' Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: info: Available initramfs generator(s): 'initramfs-tools' Mar 26 19:22:08 base-installer: error: exiting on error base-installer/initramfs/no-generator Mar 26 19:22:14 init: ^MStarting pid 1123, console /dev/vc/2: '/bin/sh' Cheers! Shyamal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
