Bug#360064: mesa-utils: glxgears is broken

2007-02-02 Thread Gabor Gombas
Hi,

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:57:38AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:

> Apart from the missing documentation, did you reproduce these problem
> recently? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.

I've just tried and could not reproduce the bug, so it can be closed.
Thanks.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#360064: mesa-utils: glxgears is broken

2007-01-25 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi,

About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
glxgears problems.
Apart from the missing documentation, did you reproduce these problem
recently? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.

Thanks,
Brice



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#360064: mesa-utils: glxgears is broken

2006-04-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 13:19 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:13:18AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> 
> > The XFree86/X.Org fork of glxgears had some fixes that were never
> > applied to the Mesa tree. These might be some of them. Are you
> > volunteering to create Mesa patches for these fixes? :)
> 
> I'm not very enthusiastic and I do not have the time :-/
> 
> > This is a feature, it reminds people that glxgears is not a benchmark.
> > Use -printfps (or -iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark :) if you
> > must.
> 
> Where is that documented (both the existence of the flag and that it is
> not for benchmarking)?

The latter is (supposed to be) common sense.

> $ man glxgears
> No manual entry for glxgears
> $ glxgears -h
> Warrning: unknown parameter: -h
> 
> $ glxgears --help
> Warrning: unknown parameter: --help
> 
> $ ls /usr/share/doc/mesa-utils
> changelog.Debian.gz  copyright

The documentation is certainly lacking. Are you volunteering... never
mind. ;)


> glxgears might not be a good benchmark but it is certainly a quite
> useful tool for quickly checking if a machine has 3D acceleration
> enabled or not.

Not in general. Just as one example, Cedega uses glxgears for this, but
it incorrectly thinks that there's no hardware acceleration when
sync-to-vblank is enabled.

glxgears is a very simple program that demonstrates the use of GLX to
display three rotating gears. Nothing less, but especially nothing more.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer



Bug#360064: mesa-utils: glxgears is broken

2006-04-03 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:13:18AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:

> The XFree86/X.Org fork of glxgears had some fixes that were never
> applied to the Mesa tree. These might be some of them. Are you
> volunteering to create Mesa patches for these fixes? :)

I'm not very enthusiastic and I do not have the time :-/

> This is a feature, it reminds people that glxgears is not a benchmark.
> Use -printfps (or -iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark :) if you
> must.

Where is that documented (both the existence of the flag and that it is
not for benchmarking)?

$ man glxgears
No manual entry for glxgears
$ glxgears -h
Warrning: unknown parameter: -h

$ glxgears --help
Warrning: unknown parameter: --help

$ ls /usr/share/doc/mesa-utils
changelog.Debian.gz  copyright

glxgears might not be a good benchmark but it is certainly a quite
useful tool for quickly checking if a machine has 3D acceleration
enabled or not.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -



Bug#360064: mesa-utils: glxgears is broken

2006-04-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 14:01 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote: 
> 
> I've upgraded to X.org 7.0 from experimental and I also installed the
> mesa-utils package since glxgears is no longer part of xbase-clients.

Indeed, X.Org no longer maintains a fork of glxgears.

> But glxgears from mesa-utils seems to be broken:
> 
> - When glxgears is first launched, the image is shifted left in the
>   window (only the rightmost few cogs of the large red cogwheel are
>   visible, everything left to it falls outside of the window)
> - If I switch destop & go back, the image appears at the right position
>   (center of the window) for a split second and then jumps back to the
>   previous position
> - If I move the window, the image appears at the center of the window,
>   but as soon as the mouse leaves the glxgears window, the window goes
>   completely blank

The XFree86/X.Org fork of glxgears had some fixes that were never
applied to the Mesa tree. These might be some of them. Are you
volunteering to create Mesa patches for these fixes? :)


> Moreover glxgears from mesa-utils do not print any frame rates, so it's
> pretty useless.

This is a feature, it reminds people that glxgears is not a benchmark.
Use -printfps (or -iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark :) if you
must.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer



Bug#360064: mesa-utils: glxgears is broken

2006-03-30 Thread Gabor Gombas
Package: mesa-utils
Version: 6.3.2-1
Severity: normal


Hi,

I've upgraded to X.org 7.0 from experimental and I also installed the
mesa-utils package since glxgears is no longer part of xbase-clients.

But glxgears from mesa-utils seems to be broken:

- When glxgears is first launched, the image is shifted left in the
  window (only the rightmost few cogs of the large red cogwheel are
  visible, everything left to it falls outside of the window)
- If I switch destop & go back, the image appears at the right position
  (center of the window) for a split second and then jumps back to the
  previous position
- If I move the window, the image appears at the center of the window,
  but as soon as the mouse leaves the glxgears window, the window goes
  completely blank

Moreover glxgears from mesa-utils do not print any frame rates, so it's
pretty useless.

Gabor

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16libata
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mesa-utils depends on:
ii  freeglut3 2.4.0-4OpenGL Utility Toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.6-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  6.4.1-0.4  A free implementation of the OpenG
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]6.4.1-0.4  The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii  libx11-6  2:1.0.0-4  X11 client-side library

mesa-utils recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]