Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
On Friday, 2006-06-09 at 19:41:19 +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Friday, 2006-06-09 at 19:28:34 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > Aha, you are using CONFIG_HIPPI -- that's marked as experimental and is > > rather obscure. (It seems to be some kind of supercomputer networking > > standard.) The offending lines are: > I vaguely remember HIPPI. It's been a long time ago. The strange thing > is that CONFIG_HIPPI is set in the default Debian config: > /boot/config-2.6.15-1-k7:CONFIG_HIPPI=y > I'll try without HIPPI again. That was indeed succesfull. Lupe Christoph -- | You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear | | weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest | | bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn't it? | | Rockhound in "Armageddon", 1998, about the Space Shuttle | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:40:36PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: >> Given http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/13/274 I believe that the line can simply >> be dropped. Let me know if you need an NMU :-) > If you could, then please yes. It's on its way. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:08:15PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > CC [M] net/ipsec/ipcomp.o > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c: In function 'skb_copy_ipcomp': > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'private' > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'private' > make[3]: *** [net/ipsec/ipcomp.o] Error 1 Aha, you are using CONFIG_HIPPI -- that's marked as experimental and is rather obscure. (It seems to be some kind of supercomputer networking standard.) The offending lines are: #ifdef CONFIG_HIPPI n->private.ifield=skb->private.ifield; #endif /* CONFIG_HIPPI */ (I can reproduce this with your .config, even though I had to run it through make oldconfig first.) Given http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/13/274 I believe that the line can simply be dropped. Let me know if you need an NMU :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
On Friday, 2006-06-09 at 19:28:34 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:08:15PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > CC [M] net/ipsec/ipcomp.o > > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c: In function 'skb_copy_ipcomp': > > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named > > 'private' > > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named > > 'private' > > make[3]: *** [net/ipsec/ipcomp.o] Error 1 > Aha, you are using CONFIG_HIPPI -- that's marked as experimental and is > rather obscure. (It seems to be some kind of supercomputer networking > standard.) The offending lines are: I vaguely remember HIPPI. It's been a long time ago. The strange thing is that CONFIG_HIPPI is set in the default Debian config: /boot/config-2.6.15-1-k7:CONFIG_HIPPI=y I'll try without HIPPI again. > (I can reproduce this with your .config, even though I had to run it through > make oldconfig first.) I wonder why you have to use oldconfig. > Given http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/13/274 I believe that the line can simply > be dropped. Let me know if you need an NMU :-) *I* don't need an NMU. But zou may want to file a bug against the Debian default kernel config ;-) I'll report back when I have run a kernel build without HIPPI. Lupe Christoph -- | You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear | | weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest | | bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn't it? | | Rockhound in "Armageddon", 1998, about the Space Shuttle | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
Am Friday 09 June 2006 18:28 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: > Aha, you are using CONFIG_HIPPI -- that's marked as experimental and is > rather obscure. (It seems to be some kind of supercomputer networking > standard.) The offending lines are: > > #ifdef CONFIG_HIPPI > n->private.ifield=skb->private.ifield; > #endif /* CONFIG_HIPPI */ > > (I can reproduce this with your .config, even though I had to run it > through make oldconfig first.) > > Given http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/13/274 I believe that the line can simply > be dropped. Let me know if you need an NMU :-) If you could, then please yes. Thanks for your help, Rene pgpuWyYpDOBYq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:56:20PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>> You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too
>> much use.
> Yes, the compilation problem - it would be also helpful if you can reproduce
> it.
Let's see. Default .config and latest linux-source-2.6.16 (2.6.16-14)
compiles just fine for me using "make-kpkg --added-patches openswan
kernel-image":
pannekake:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.16# ls net/ipsec/ip{sec_alg,comp}.o
net/ipsec/ipcomp.o net/ipsec/ipsec_alg.o
It looks like that doesn't compile ipsec_alg_cryptoapi.o, though, so let's
try enabling CONFIG_KLIPS_ENC_CRYPTOAPI:
pannekake:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.16# ls -l net/ipsec/ipsec_alg*.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 980 2006-06-06 23:50 net/ipsec/ipsec_alg_cryptoapi.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12440 2006-06-06 23:50 net/ipsec/ipsec_alg.o
In other words, I can't reproduce this. Lupe, could we please get to see your
.config?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
Am Tuesday 06 June 2006 19:15 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: > You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too > much use. Yes, the compilation problem - it would be also helpful if you can reproduce it. Thanks for the NMU, Rene pgpqdtKgDrJje.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:07:17PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: >> Attached is the diff for my openswan 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU. (Note that >> all the changes, except for the one to debian/changelog, are done in the >> upstream tarball.) > Thanks, I will apply it as soon as possible (but am currently _very_ busy > with > another project, so please feel free to NMU the other RC bug if you feel like > it). You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too much use. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
