Bug#367694: [xml/sgml] RFC/RFS docbook-xsl 1.70.0.dfsg.1
Am Montag, den 29.05.2006, 18:15 -0400 schrieb Adam Di Carlo: Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am Samstag, den 20.05.2006, 20:25 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: I prepared a first NMU for the latest release of the docbook-xsl package, which was released recently (version 1.70.0). In the meantime, 1.70.1 was released. The source files can be found at http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/. The changes I made are documented in http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/docbook-xsl_1.70.0.dfsg.1-0.1_i386.changes. Source: http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/ Changes: http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/docbook-xsl_1.70.1.dfsg.1-0.1_i386.changes Still waiting for an answer or a sign of life :) Well, should I test and NMU it? Yes. If you would do that, this would be nice. One small thing, which could be improved is to have a closer look at the xml files in the wwordml directory. I guess, the stylesheets do not need all of them. But atm I'm still unsure, so they are left. Many other files have been dropped, because they are IMO useless for the stylesheets (see debian/rules). I use this package locally without any problems. I'm not the docbook-xsl maintainer but I am a Debian developer. But you are a member of debian-xml-sgml. I'm still trying to reach Mark Johnson. Do you know, if he is still active? Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367694: [xml/sgml] RFC/RFS docbook-xsl 1.70.0.dfsg.1
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am Samstag, den 20.05.2006, 20:25 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: I prepared a first NMU for the latest release of the docbook-xsl package, which was released recently (version 1.70.0). In the meantime, 1.70.1 was released. The source files can be found at http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/. The changes I made are documented in http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/docbook-xsl_1.70.0.dfsg.1-0.1_i386.changes. Source: http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/ Changes: http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/docbook-xsl_1.70.1.dfsg.1-0.1_i386.changes Still waiting for an answer or a sign of life :) Well, should I test and NMU it? I'm not the docbook-xsl maintainer but I am a Debian developer. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367694: [xml/sgml] RFC/RFS docbook-xsl 1.70.0.dfsg.1
Am Samstag, den 20.05.2006, 20:25 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: I prepared a first NMU for the latest release of the docbook-xsl package, which was released recently (version 1.70.0). In the meantime, 1.70.1 was released. The source files can be found at http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/. The changes I made are documented in http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/docbook-xsl_1.70.0.dfsg.1-0.1_i386.changes. Source: http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/ Changes: http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/docbook-xsl_1.70.1.dfsg.1-0.1_i386.changes Still waiting for an answer or a sign of life :) Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
