Bug#373761: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6: FTBFS on hppa with new gmp-4.2: 37 of 117 tests failed

2006-06-17 Thread Joel Soete



Laurent Fousse wrote:

Hello,

* Joel Soete [Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 03:00:54PM +0200]:


Package: libmpfr-dev
Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Hello Laurent,

As you may be already read in buildd report:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mpfrver=2.2.0.dfsg.1-6arch=hppastamp=1149775099file=logas=raw

the build of the mpfr pakages with newest gmp-4.2.dfsg-1 failled.



Thanks for your report.



And afaik it seems to be now required to rebuild new gcc stuff (gfortran if I
well understood).



You understood correctly.



I already tried:
 * the rebuild with previous gcc-4.0,
 * the rebuild with -O0 gcc option (in case of optimization pb),
 * rebuild localy latest gmp src 4.2.1 + latest patch,
 * and apply latest mpfr pathes (9 .. 12).

but nothing help.



Do you mean you get the same test failures as in the log you link to,
or another error?


mmm, tbh I didn't pay attention accuratley if erronus digits were exactely the 
same but that was always the same test which failed ;-(


I'm trying to reproduce the problem with upstream sources but I hit
another build failure (undefined reference to `__gmpn_umul_ppmm')
which I've reported upstream. I'm not quite sure why we don't hit it
in the debian builds as well.


No, I didn't met this failure?
Just a sample from my log:
[snip]
checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... yes
checking if gmp.h version and libgmp version are the same... (4.2.1/4.2.1) yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating tests/Makefile
config.status: creating mparam.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
/usr/bin/make
/usr/1]: Entering directory `/CAD/parisc-linux/Dpkg/dpkg-work/mpfr-2.2.0.dfsg.1'
cd .  /bin/sh /CAD/parisc-linux/Dpkg/dpkg-work/mpfr-2.2.0.dfsg.1/missing 
--run aclocal-1.9
/usr/share/aclocal/tcl.m4:20: warning: underquoted definition of 
SC_PATH_TCLCONFIG
  run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
[snip]
Seed GMP_CHECK_RANDOMIZE=1151362840 (include this in bug reports)
Error for lngamma(0.1100E-66)
FAIL: tlngamma
==
37 of 117 tests failed
==
[snip]

(it didn't mentioned that I also applied latest mpfr patches but I did it well 
;-) )

Thanks,
Joel

Laurent.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#373761: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6: FTBFS on hppa with new gmp-4.2: 37 of 117 tests failed

2006-06-16 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hello,

* Joel Soete [Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 03:00:54PM +0200]:
 Package: libmpfr-dev
 Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-4
 Severity: serious
 Justification: no longer builds from source
 
 Hello Laurent,
 
 As you may be already read in buildd report:
 http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mpfrver=2.2.0.dfsg.1-6arch=hppastamp=1149775099file=logas=raw
 
 the build of the mpfr pakages with newest gmp-4.2.dfsg-1 failled.

Thanks for your report.

 And afaik it seems to be now required to rebuild new gcc stuff (gfortran if I
 well understood).

You understood correctly.

 I already tried:
   * the rebuild with previous gcc-4.0,
   * the rebuild with -O0 gcc option (in case of optimization pb),
   * rebuild localy latest gmp src 4.2.1 + latest patch,
   * and apply latest mpfr pathes (9 .. 12).
 
 but nothing help.

Do you mean you get the same test failures as in the log you link to,
or another error?

I'm trying to reproduce the problem with upstream sources but I hit
another build failure (undefined reference to `__gmpn_umul_ppmm')
which I've reported upstream. I'm not quite sure why we don't hit it
in the debian builds as well.

Laurent.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#373761: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6: FTBFS on hppa with new gmp-4.2: 37 of 117 tests failed

2006-06-16 Thread Laurent Fousse
* Laurent Fousse [Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:39:38PM +0200]:
 I'm trying to reproduce the problem with upstream sources but I hit
 another build failure (undefined reference to `__gmpn_umul_ppmm')
 which I've reported upstream. I'm not quite sure why we don't hit it
 in the debian builds as well.

That's because the private symbol name changed from 4.2 to 4.2.1 and
we're still building against 4.2 in debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#373761: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6: FTBFS on hppa with new gmp-4.2: 37 of 117 tests failed

2006-06-15 Thread Joel Soete
Package: libmpfr-dev
Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello Laurent,

As you may be already read in buildd report:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mpfrver=2.2.0.dfsg.1-6arch=hppastamp=1149775099file=logas=raw

the build of the mpfr pakages with newest gmp-4.2.dfsg-1 failled.
And afaik it seems to be now required to rebuild new gcc stuff (gfortran if I
well understood).

I already tried:
  * the rebuild with previous gcc-4.0,
  * the rebuild with -O0 gcc option (in case of optimization pb),
  * rebuild localy latest gmp src 4.2.1 + latest patch,
  * and apply latest mpfr pathes (9 .. 12).

but nothing help.

Thanks in advance for your attention,
Joel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: hppa (parisc64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rc6-pa3em-b2k64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libmpfr-dev depends on:
ii  libgmp3-dev   4.2.1-exp0 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libmpfr1  2.2.0.dfsg.1-4 multiple precision floating-point

libmpfr-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--
Club Scarlet : Tout le monde gagne! Si vous devenez aujourd'hui Scarlet One 
grace a un client existant de Scarlet, vous recevez tous les deux un cadeau 
d'une valeur de 50 euros! Surfez vite sur http://www.clubscarlet.be