Bug#378399: g++-4.1 workaround can be removed
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:20:07AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The g++-4.1 workaround introduced in 5.8.8-6 can be removed; fixed in 4.1.1-7 and up. Thanks Matthias. Currently perl has a build-depend on a specific version of gcc, do I need to change that to gcc (= 4:4.1.1-7) | gcc-4.1 (= 4.1.1-7) or does gcc-defaults require a version bump? An additional issue which occurs to me is that if I revert the change so that perl.h distributed in the perl package again contains the register declaration, this may cause problems with building binary modules or programs which embed perl unless those packages also declare a similar build-dependency. Drats. Pity build-dependencies aren't transitive. Do you think that it's safe to at least assume that the build daemons will have the newer g++ installed? --bod -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378399: g++-4.1 workaround can be removed
Brendan O'Dea writes: On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:20:07AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: The g++-4.1 workaround introduced in 5.8.8-6 can be removed; fixed in 4.1.1-7 and up. Thanks Matthias. Currently perl has a build-depend on a specific version of gcc, do I need to change that to gcc (= 4:4.1.1-7) | gcc-4.1 (= 4.1.1-7) or does gcc-defaults require a version bump? An additional issue which occurs to me is that if I revert the change so that perl.h distributed in the perl package again contains the register declaration, this may cause problems with building binary modules or programs which embed perl unless those packages also declare a similar build-dependency. right, but that should not be the problem of the perl package. Drats. Pity build-dependencies aren't transitive. you could add conflicts (as the build-conflicts below). but maybe more ugly. Do you think that it's safe to at least assume that the build daemons will have the newer g++ installed? not sure, but the easiest thing would be do build-conflict with gcc-4.1 (= 4.1.1-7), gcc-4.1 (= 4.1.1-6), gcc-4.1 (= 4.1.1-5), ... I'm unsure, which version was the first version to have that bug. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378399: g++-4.1 workaround can be removed
Package: perl Version: 5.8.8-6 Severity: important The g++-4.1 workaround introduced in 5.8.8-6 can be removed; fixed in 4.1.1-7 and up. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]