Bug#380439: tinyscheme: Segmentation fault on (let (x 1))
Package: tinyscheme Version: 1.37-3 Severity: important To reproduce the bug, type this at the command line: $ tinyscheme TinyScheme 1.37 > (let (x 1)) Segmentation fault -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-satapm Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages tinyscheme depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries tinyscheme recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380439: tinyscheme: Segmentation fault on (let (x 1))
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:19:54AM +0200, Volker Grabsch wrote: > $ tinyscheme > TinyScheme 1.37 > > (let (x 1)) > Segmentation fault I verified this. Actually, it seems tinyscheme will segfault if the let assignment list contains any numbers. I will forward this upstream. (Just to make sure: you do know it should probably be (let ((x 1)))?) Panu -- personal contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], +35841 5323835 technical contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.iki.fi/atehwa/ PGP fingerprint:0EA5 9D33 6590 FFD4 921C 5A5F BE85 08F1 3169 70EC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380439: tinyscheme: Segmentation fault on (let (x 1))
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:59:53AM +0300, Panu Kalliokoski wrote: > (Just to make sure: you do know it should probably be (let ((x 1)))?) Of course I do. This was just a typo. :-) Nevertheless, a program should never segfault, no matter how bad the input was. Greets, Volker -- Volker Grabsch ---<<(())>>--- Administrator NotJustHosting GbR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380439: tinyscheme: Segmentation fault on (let (x 1))
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 01:42:30PM +0200, Volker Grabsch wrote: > > (Just to make sure: you do know it should probably be (let ((x 1)))?) > > Of course I do. This was just a typo. :-) > Nevertheless, a program should never segfault, no matter how bad > the input was. Yes, granted. Panu -- personal contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], +35841 5323835 technical contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.iki.fi/atehwa/ PGP fingerprint:0EA5 9D33 6590 FFD4 921C 5A5F BE85 08F1 3169 70EC Please consider membership of http://www.hospitalityclub.org/! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380439: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#380439: tinyscheme: Segmentation fault on (let (x 1))]
(Sorry for the doubles. I'm learning to use Debian's BTS. Please preserve the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address in CC on reply.) Hello, I received the following bug report against tinyscheme 1.37. It seems that if the formals list in (let) has anything but (var value) lists, tinyscheme may crash. The use of |cadar| in OP_LET1 and |caar| in OP_LET2 is unprotected. - Forwarded message from Volker Grabsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:43:03 +0300 Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Subject: Bug#380439: tinyscheme: Segmentation fault on (let (x 1)) Reply-To: Volker Grabsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-From: Volker Grabsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:33:13 UTC Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 380439 X-Debian-PR-Package: tinyscheme X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: tinyscheme From: Volker Grabsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 01:33:17 -0700 X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Package: tinyscheme Version: 1.37-3 Severity: important To reproduce the bug, type this at the command line: $ tinyscheme TinyScheme 1.37 > (let (x 1)) Segmentation fault -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-satapm Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages tinyscheme depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries tinyscheme recommends no packages. -- no debconf information - End forwarded message - -- personal contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], +35841 5323835 technical contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.iki.fi/atehwa/ PGP fingerprint:0EA5 9D33 6590 FFD4 921C 5A5F BE85 08F1 3169 70EC Please consider membership of http://www.hospitalityclub.org/! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
