Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml
Jerome Alet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: >> Well, my gut feeling is that jaxml is dead upstream and not likely to >> be adopted (I've never had much luck contacting Victor, cf. #305460, >> #312834, #317408). I'll be glad to be proven wrong of course. > > Your feeling was incorrect. > > The fact that there's no new upstream release doesn't mean that the > project is dead. Being the original author, I can confirm it is not. I'm glad to hear that. However, we do need a Debian maintainer for jaxml -- it hasn't had one for a year and a half -- so I'd still like to hear from Victor. > I'm just back from holidays and seeing a lot of debian messages > about this software. I'm currently trying to read the 1500 messages > which waited for me to be back, when this is done, if something has > to be changed to jaxml I'll do it. The necessary changes were Debian-specific, and have been taken care of by Pierre [1] and me [2]. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jaxml/news/20060802T115443Z.html [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jaxml/news/20060806T213217Z.html Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml
Hi, On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Le mar 1 août 2006 22:42, Matej Vela a écrit : > >[...] > >> Victor, as the maintainer of scanerrlog, would you like to adopt > >> jaxml? > >> > >> And QA folks: can we go ahead and remove jaxml immediately? If it's > >> adopted and renamed, it'll have to go through NEW anyway. > > > > I just did an upload that addressed that, and the package should hit NEW > > soon. > > Well, my gut feeling is that jaxml is dead upstream and not likely to > be adopted (I've never had much luck contacting Victor, cf. #305460, > #312834, #317408). I'll be glad to be proven wrong of course. Your feeling was incorrect. The fact that there's no new upstream release doesn't mean that the project is dead. Being the original author, I can confirm it is not. I'm just back from holidays and seeing a lot of debian messages about this software. I'm currently trying to read the 1500 messages which waited for me to be back, when this is done, if something has to be changed to jaxml I'll do it. bye Jerome Alet
Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml
Le mar 1 août 2006 23:45, Matej Vela a écrit : > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Le mar 1 août 2006 22:42, Matej Vela a écrit : > >[...] > > > >> Victor, as the maintainer of scanerrlog, would you like to adopt > >> jaxml? > >> > >> And QA folks: can we go ahead and remove jaxml immediately? If > >> it's adopted and renamed, it'll have to go through NEW anyway. > > > > I just did an upload that addressed that, and the package should > > hit NEW soon. > > Well, my gut feeling is that jaxml is dead upstream and not likely to > be adopted (I've never had much luck contacting Victor, cf. #305460, > #312834, #317408). I'll be glad to be proven wrong of course. well, my mail was informative, to say that while I was working on the QA packages, I already saw the problems you reported and fixed them before knowing the package may eventually be removed. I couldn't care less about it beeing removed or not. so I'll let you proceed with what you feel as adequate here. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpi6AazR55jq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le mar 1 août 2006 22:42, Matej Vela a écrit : >[...] >> Victor, as the maintainer of scanerrlog, would you like to adopt >> jaxml? >> >> And QA folks: can we go ahead and remove jaxml immediately? If it's >> adopted and renamed, it'll have to go through NEW anyway. > > I just did an upload that addressed that, and the package should hit NEW > soon. Well, my gut feeling is that jaxml is dead upstream and not likely to be adopted (I've never had much luck contacting Victor, cf. #305460, #312834, #317408). I'll be glad to be proven wrong of course. Cheers, Matej
Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml
retitle 380848 Python transition (#2): misnamed package with public modules thanks jaxml is a bit of an anomaly: it used a single package to provide a public module for Python 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. It's not a stand-alone application, so it should really, really be called python-jaxml. There are two reverse dependencies: zope-zshell, which is likely to be removed (#361018), and scanerrlog, which is about to break due to a dependency on python (<< 2.4). Victor, as the maintainer of scanerrlog, would you like to adopt jaxml? And QA folks: can we go ahead and remove jaxml immediately? If it's adopted and renamed, it'll have to go through NEW anyway. Cheers, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml
Le mar 1 août 2006 22:42, Matej Vela a écrit : > retitle 380848 Python transition (#2): misnamed package with public > modules thanks > > jaxml is a bit of an anomaly: it used a single package to provide a > public module for Python 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. It's not a stand-alone > application, so it should really, really be called python-jaxml. > > There are two reverse dependencies: zope-zshell, which is likely to > be removed (#361018), and scanerrlog, which is about to break due to > a dependency on python (<< 2.4). > > Victor, as the maintainer of scanerrlog, would you like to adopt > jaxml? > > And QA folks: can we go ahead and remove jaxml immediately? If it's > adopted and renamed, it'll have to go through NEW anyway. I just did an upload that addressed that, and the package should hit NEW soon. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpDdk8JcawQy.pgp Description: PGP signature
