Bug#382330: ftp.debian.org: please remove gmime2.1 source package
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 07:32:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: retitle 382330 [auto-cruftable] RM: gmime2.1 -- RoM; superseded by gmime2.2 thanks Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:32 +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: [...] Once gmime2.2 is accepted in the archive, and tomboy, beagle, balsa and pan are recompiled gmime2.1 source package can be removed. Once gmime2.1 no longer has any reverse dependencies, its removal will occur semi-automagically. Eh, no, I don't think so... why would it? Reverse dependencies have no influence on any of the auto-cruft stuff anyway, and in this case, not all binary packages will be taken over by something else. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382330: ftp.debian.org: please remove gmime2.1 source package
retitle 382330 RM: gmime2.1 -- RoM; superseded by gmime2.2 thanks On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 11:40 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 07:32:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] Once gmime2.2 is accepted in the archive, and tomboy, beagle, balsa and pan are recompiled gmime2.1 source package can be removed. Once gmime2.1 no longer has any reverse dependencies, its removal will occur semi-automagically. Eh, no, I don't think so... why would it? Reverse dependencies have no influence on any of the auto-cruft stuff anyway, and in this case, not all binary packages will be taken over by something else. Erm... yeah. Good question. *sigh* I'm sure it made sense to me at the time but you are, of course, absolutely correct. Retitling... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382330: ftp.debian.org: please remove gmime2.1 source package
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Once gmime2.2 is accepted in the archive, and tomboy, beagle, balsa and pan are recompiled gmime2.1 source package can be removed. I will add blockers for this bug as soon as gmime2.2 is accepted and I can file bugs asking for those packages to be upgraded to new gmime2.2 dependency (gmime2.2 should be completely compatible with gmime2.1) Cheers, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382330: ftp.debian.org: please remove gmime2.1 source package
retitle 382330 [auto-cruftable] RM: gmime2.1 -- RoM; superseded by gmime2.2 thanks Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:32 +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: [...] Once gmime2.2 is accepted in the archive, and tomboy, beagle, balsa and pan are recompiled gmime2.1 source package can be removed. Once gmime2.1 no longer has any reverse dependencies, its removal will occur semi-automagically. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
