Bug#393554: Intent to NMU
Hi Eric and Dann, I released openct 0.6.10-pre1 with that patch and if noone complains it will be 0.6.10 by mid next week. this release also includes very minor fixes for bsd and patches I gathered elsewhere. it might be better to test the new version than create a nmu. if you give the new version a try, please remember to edit etc/init-script.in and uncomment the chown/chgrp lines, as those would help debian and ubuntu to make sure the permissions on /var/run/openct are always correct. Thanks, Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#393554: Intent to NMU
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:51:22AM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: Hi Eric and Dann, I released openct 0.6.10-pre1 with that patch and if noone complains it will be 0.6.10 by mid next week. this release also includes very minor fixes for bsd and patches I gathered elsewhere. it might be better to test the new version than create a nmu. if you give the new version a try, please remember to edit etc/init-script.in and uncomment the chown/chgrp lines, as those would help debian and ubuntu to make sure the permissions on /var/run/openct are always correct. hey Andreas/Eric, At this point we're just gambling on the freeze date. My vote (fwiw) would be to MU a new package with this fix (0.6.9-2 or a 0.6.10~pre1-1) at an elevated priority to get it into testing ASAP, and then upload a new upstream to unstable as soon as available to give it a chance of releasing in etch. Of course, if we miss the freeze you can always ask the RMs to take the version from sid, given that it fixes a bug with Important severity. However, it'll likely be easier to convince them to migrate a version with just this patch applied than a new upstream. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#393554: Intent to NMU
tags 393554 + patch thanks On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:23:59PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: You may have tagged it patch, but I don't see a patch anywhere. oops! Sorry Eric - here it is: --- openct-0.6.9/src/ifd/utils.c~ 2006-09-12 17:23:07.0 -0600 +++ openct-0.6.9/src/ifd/utils.c2006-10-16 14:32:23.0 -0600 @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include unistd.h #include sys/stat.h #include sys/wait.h +#include string.h #ifndef __GNUC__ void ifd_debug(int level, const char *fmt, ...) -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#393554: Intent to NMU
tags 393554 - patch thanks * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertag 392230 + intend-to-nmu usertag 395216 + intend-to-nmu usertag 395218 + intend-to-nmu usertag 393554 + intend-to-nmu thanks hey, As these bugs have been open with a patch for over a week without a rejection from the maintainer (and etch is quickly approaching), I intend to NMU the associated package in one day's time. If you do not wish for this NMU to occur, please send a follow-up in the bug report stating as such or, better yet, fix it in an MU :) Unless you request otherwise, any NMUs I upload will be to the DELAYED queue, so you will have an additional week to supersede my upload with an MU to prevent it from entering unstable. With the current release schedule, these NMUs will likely not make the freeze, so an MU (or permission to upload an NMU that bypasses DELAYED) would be greatly appreciated. You may have tagged it patch, but I don't see a patch anywhere. -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
