Bug#394438: received via SMTP or fetchmail

2006-10-22 Thread Olaf van der Spek

Hi,

> mail sent by smarthost; received via SMTP or fetchmail

Maybe a more detailed explanation should be given for that question.
If you only listen on localhost:smtp, receiving email is going to be a 
bit hard. Listening on localhost:smtp is fine for sending email of course.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#394438: received via SMTP or fetchmail

2006-10-23 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:18:34PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 11:15:41AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> >>>mail sent by smarthost; received via SMTP or fetchmail
> >>Maybe a more detailed explanation should be given for that question.
> >>If you only listen on localhost:smtp, receiving email is going to be a 
> >>bit hard.
> >
> >This is perfectly reasonable for receiving via fetchmail.
> 
> True, but the or doesn't make that clear. Something like 'received via 
> SMTP combined with fetchmail' would be more clear.
> In the original sentence, it sounds like SMTP can be used on it's own.

It can. Just configure exim to listen on a publicly reachable interface.

If you are qualified for running a publicly reachable SMTP server on
the Internet, you should be able to figure that out by yourself.

Greeetings
Marc

-- 
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#394438: received via SMTP or fetchmail

2006-10-23 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 11:15:41AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > mail sent by smarthost; received via SMTP or fetchmail
> 
> Maybe a more detailed explanation should be given for that question.
> If you only listen on localhost:smtp, receiving email is going to be a 
> bit hard.

This is perfectly reasonable for receiving via fetchmail.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#394438: received via SMTP or fetchmail

2006-10-23 Thread Olaf van der Spek

Marc Haber wrote:

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:18:34PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:

Marc Haber wrote:

On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 11:15:41AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:

mail sent by smarthost; received via SMTP or fetchmail

Maybe a more detailed explanation should be given for that question.
If you only listen on localhost:smtp, receiving email is going to be a 
bit hard.

This is perfectly reasonable for receiving via fetchmail.
True, but the or doesn't make that clear. Something like 'received via 
SMTP combined with fetchmail' would be more clear.

In the original sentence, it sounds like SMTP can be used on it's own.


It can. Just configure exim to listen on a publicly reachable interface.


Of course exim can. But that answer makes it sound like it'll configure 
that for you. Just mentioning localhost in the answer would probably 
make this clear.



If you are qualified for running a publicly reachable SMTP server on
the Internet, you should be able to figure that out by yourself.

Greeetings
Marc




--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#394438: received via SMTP or fetchmail

2006-10-23 Thread Olaf van der Spek

Marc Haber wrote:

On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 11:15:41AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:

mail sent by smarthost; received via SMTP or fetchmail

Maybe a more detailed explanation should be given for that question.
If you only listen on localhost:smtp, receiving email is going to be a 
bit hard.


This is perfectly reasonable for receiving via fetchmail.


True, but the or doesn't make that clear. Something like 'received via 
SMTP combined with fetchmail' would be more clear.

In the original sentence, it sounds like SMTP can be used on it's own.

--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]