Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-12-01 Thread Brian Gough

Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

Hi Petr,

On 30 November 2006 at 14:29, Petr Salinger wrote:
| Package: gsl
| Severity: important
| Version: 1.8-2
| Tags: patch
| 
| Hi,
| 
| the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.


Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port was an
officially supported architecture -- so severity 'important' is inflated, no?

Either way, the patch looks straighforwaed indeed and I am CCing Brian Gough
as a heads-up.  It is of course up to the GSL team to decide whether they
apply it upstream or not, but I think I'll make a new release for Debian
later today.


Thank you, I  have made the change below which should cover this and any 
other cases.


--
Brian Gough
(GSL Maintainer)

Network Theory Ltd,
Publishing the GSL Manual - http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/manual/


Index: configure.ac
===
RCS file: /home/gsl-cvs/gsl/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -r1.32 configure.ac
215c215
 *86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux*)
---
 *86-*-gnu | *86_64-*-gnu | *86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux*)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-12-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 1 December 2006 at 11:23, Brian Gough wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|  Hi Petr,
|  
|  On 30 November 2006 at 14:29, Petr Salinger wrote:
|  | Package: gsl
|  | Severity: important
|  | Version: 1.8-2
|  | Tags: patch
|  | 
|  | Hi,
|  | 
|  | the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
|  
|  Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port was 
an
|  officially supported architecture -- so severity 'important' is inflated, 
no?
|  
|  Either way, the patch looks straighforwaed indeed and I am CCing Brian Gough
|  as a heads-up.  It is of course up to the GSL team to decide whether they
|  apply it upstream or not, but I think I'll make a new release for Debian
|  later today.
| 
| Thank you, I  have made the change below which should cover this and any 
| other cases.

Nice one. Earlier, I had made a one-off 1.8-3 release with Petr patch too, so
we should be fine all around. Thanks again to both of you.

Dirk

| -- 
| Brian Gough
| (GSL Maintainer)
| 
| Network Theory Ltd,
| Publishing the GSL Manual - http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/manual/
| 
| 
| Index: configure.ac
| ===
| RCS file: /home/gsl-cvs/gsl/configure.ac,v
| retrieving revision 1.32
| diff -r1.32 configure.ac
| 215c215
|  *86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux*)
| ---
|   *86-*-gnu | *86_64-*-gnu | *86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux*)

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
  -- Thomas A. Edison


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-11-30 Thread Petr Salinger

Package: gsl
Severity: important
Version: 1.8-2
Tags: patch

Hi,

the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.

It needs small tweak to configure.ac/configure,
see bellow.

It would also be nice if you can ask upstream
to include this change.

Thanks in advance

Petr


--- gsl-1.8.orig/configure.ac
+++ gsl-1.8/configure.ac
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
 powerpc-*-linux*)
 ac_cv_c_ieee_interface=gnuppc
 ;;
-*86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux*)
+*86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux* | *86-*-kfreebsd*-gnu | 
*86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu)
 ac_cv_c_ieee_interface=gnux86
 ;;
 *-*-sunos4*)



--- gsl-1.8.orig/configure
+++ gsl-1.8/configure
@@ -11421,7 +11421,7 @@
 powerpc-*-linux*)
 ac_cv_c_ieee_interface=gnuppc
 ;;
-*86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux*)
+*86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux* | *86-*-kfreebsd*-gnu | 
*86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu)
 ac_cv_c_ieee_interface=gnux86
 ;;
 *-*-sunos4*)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-11-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

Hi Petr,

On 30 November 2006 at 14:29, Petr Salinger wrote:
| Package: gsl
| Severity: important
| Version: 1.8-2
| Tags: patch
| 
| Hi,
| 
| the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port was an
officially supported architecture -- so severity 'important' is inflated, no?

Either way, the patch looks straighforwaed indeed and I am CCing Brian Gough
as a heads-up.  It is of course up to the GSL team to decide whether they
apply it upstream or not, but I think I'll make a new release for Debian
later today.

Thanks, Dirk

 
| It needs small tweak to configure.ac/configure,
| see bellow.
| 
| It would also be nice if you can ask upstream
| to include this change.
| 
| Thanks in advance
| 
|  Petr
| 
| 
| --- gsl-1.8.orig/configure.ac
| +++ gsl-1.8/configure.ac
| @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
|   powerpc-*-linux*)
|   ac_cv_c_ieee_interface=gnuppc
|   ;;
| -*86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux*)
| +*86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux* | *86-*-kfreebsd*-gnu | 
*86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu)
|   ac_cv_c_ieee_interface=gnux86
|   ;;
|   *-*-sunos4*)
| 
| 
| 
| --- gsl-1.8.orig/configure
| +++ gsl-1.8/configure
| @@ -11421,7 +11421,7 @@
|   powerpc-*-linux*)
|   ac_cv_c_ieee_interface=gnuppc
|   ;;
| -*86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux*)
| +*86-*-linux* | *86_64-*-linux* | *86-*-kfreebsd*-gnu | 
*86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu)
|   ac_cv_c_ieee_interface=gnux86
|   ;;
|   *-*-sunos4*)
| 
| 

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
  -- Thomas A. Edison


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-11-30 Thread Petr Salinger

Hi Dirk.


the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.



Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port
was an officially supported architecture -- so severity 'important' is 
inflated, no?


For official releasable architecture it would be 'serious'.

The correct severity for us is not clear, but see also
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/06/msg00239.html

Either way, the patch looks straighforwaed indeed and I am CCing Brian 
Gough as a heads-up. It is of course up to the GSL team to decide 
whether they apply it upstream or not,

but I think I'll make a new release for Debian later today.


Many thanks, but I would suggest you to wait with upload 
until current version really migrates into testing.

It should go in today.

Petr


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401036: gsl: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-11-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 30 November 2006 at 17:55, Petr Salinger wrote:
| Hi Dirk.
| 
|  the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
| 
|  Correct me if I'm wrong but I was not aware that the GNU/kFreeBSD port
|  was an officially supported architecture -- so severity 'important' is 
|  inflated, no?
| 
| For official releasable architecture it would be 'serious'.
| 
| The correct severity for us is not clear, but see also
| http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/06/msg00239.html

It is clear that it is important to you, but also realize that it is
important no few others.  So I still call this wishlist, or at the most
'normal'.  Anyway.
 
|  Either way, the patch looks straighforwaed indeed and I am CCing Brian 
|  Gough as a heads-up. It is of course up to the GSL team to decide 
|  whether they apply it upstream or not,
|  but I think I'll make a new release for Debian later today.
| 
| Many thanks, but I would suggest you to wait with upload 
| until current version really migrates into testing.
| It should go in today.

Good idea. We want to have testing in good shape.

Dirk

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
  -- Thomas A. Edison


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]