Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
Cool, so I'll give it a try ASAP ! José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez a écrit : > Hi again, with the release of the version 2.0 of gwt, hosted mode > browser doesn't exist anymore, so the mozilla /iceweasel/firefox > nightmare should have disapperared. > > Cheers. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
Hi again, with the release of the version 2.0 of gwt, hosted mode browser doesn't exist anymore, so the mozilla /iceweasel/firefox nightmare should have disapperared. Cheers. 2009/9/9 Christian BAYLE > José Luis Redrejo a écrit : > > > > > > 2009/7/21 Christian BAYLE mailto:ba...@debian.org>> > > > > Hi > > > > I tried many time, but still got problem with IceWeasel-Firefox / > > Eclipse binary part that is in fact prebuilt. > > > > > > > > These parts are for the hosted mode browser or also for the gwt compiler. > > In fact, to be able to upload gwt based applications to Debian, we would > > only need to have in Debian the gwt compiler. > > Maybe splittiing gwt in parts and trying to work in the easier first > > might be a good approach. > > > > > Good idea, I didn't pay attention this would be possible > > > > > If you want to help on > > this, and have some time, maybe try to get some explanation from > > upstream dev about this part. > > > > > > > > I have not much time, but I'm really interested in having the compiler > > in Debian, so if the eclipse/iceweasel stuff can be overrided this way, > > maybe we could work together with upstream to get this first target. > > > > > If you have got some trick or patch just to build the compiler, removing > binary stuffs, It would help me, but I'm not sure compiler don't use any > native stuffs. > > > > > > > It should probably go in java packaging project when it's done. > > > > > > > > Sure, I'm sure that there are a lot of people of this project with more > > java knowledge than me. > > > > Cheers > > Christian > >
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
Thomas Sachau a écrit : > Do you have some better contact way than their google group? I didnt even get > an answer to some > questions i sent there some weeks ago, so until there is a way to get a > developer answer or some > other contact way to get anwers, i fear i wont make bigger progress. > > Unfortunatly not, I didn't try to contact them yet grep -r '@google.com' trunk/ gives a bunch of mail that may be usefull don't hesitate to CC me Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
Christian BAYLE schrieb: > Thomas Sachau a écrit : >> Can someone send me the actual state of building including those of the >> included jars? I tried to >> create a package for GWT for gentoo, but packaging this beast is still >> nonetrivial. >> >> It would also be nice, if someone could point me to the sources for the >> following included jars: >> >> -naming-common-1.0.jar >> -naiming-java-1.0.jar >> -naming-resources-1.0.jar >> -servlets-common-1.0.jar >> -tomcat-jk2-2.1.jar >> -catalina.jar >> > I think tha most source, you can't find are provided in gwt as > *-src.jar, and the rest is in the distro, all these for me is part of > tomcat, for catalina I'm sure, but I didn't check in details. I dont want to use included sources from gwt project, but want to use the original sources. And a short check showed me that at least at gentoo side there is only >=tomcat-5.5, while the first 5 are only in older versions, which are no longer supported. The catalina source is also in newer versions, but the version from tomcat does not work with gwt for myself. > >> In addition, whats the current state of building the eclipse/firefox stuff? > > I didnt dig since some time, the best would be to ask upstream how they > build this, as I never could something that worked. > > I'm interested if you make some progress Do you have some better contact way than their google group? I didnt even get an answer to some questions i sent there some weeks ago, so until there is a way to get a developer answer or some other contact way to get anwers, i fear i wont make bigger progress. -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
Thomas Sachau a écrit : > Can someone send me the actual state of building including those of the > included jars? I tried to > create a package for GWT for gentoo, but packaging this beast is still > nonetrivial. > > It would also be nice, if someone could point me to the sources for the > following included jars: > > -naming-common-1.0.jar > -naiming-java-1.0.jar > -naming-resources-1.0.jar > -servlets-common-1.0.jar > -tomcat-jk2-2.1.jar > -catalina.jar > I think tha most source, you can't find are provided in gwt as *-src.jar, and the rest is in the distro, all these for me is part of tomcat, for catalina I'm sure, but I didn't check in details. > In addition, whats the current state of building the eclipse/firefox stuff? I didnt dig since some time, the best would be to ask upstream how they build this, as I never could something that worked. I'm interested if you make some progress Cheers Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
Can someone send me the actual state of building including those of the included jars? I tried to create a package for GWT for gentoo, but packaging this beast is still nonetrivial. It would also be nice, if someone could point me to the sources for the following included jars: -naming-common-1.0.jar -naiming-java-1.0.jar -naming-resources-1.0.jar -servlets-common-1.0.jar -tomcat-jk2-2.1.jar -catalina.jar In addition, whats the current state of building the eclipse/firefox stuff? -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
José Luis Redrejo a écrit : > > > 2009/7/21 Christian BAYLE mailto:ba...@debian.org>> > > Hi > > I tried many time, but still got problem with IceWeasel-Firefox / > Eclipse binary part that is in fact prebuilt. > > > > These parts are for the hosted mode browser or also for the gwt compiler. > In fact, to be able to upload gwt based applications to Debian, we would > only need to have in Debian the gwt compiler. > Maybe splittiing gwt in parts and trying to work in the easier first > might be a good approach. > > Good idea, I didn't pay attention this would be possible > > If you want to help on > this, and have some time, maybe try to get some explanation from > upstream dev about this part. > > > > I have not much time, but I'm really interested in having the compiler > in Debian, so if the eclipse/iceweasel stuff can be overrided this way, > maybe we could work together with upstream to get this first target. > > If you have got some trick or patch just to build the compiler, removing binary stuffs, It would help me, but I'm not sure compiler don't use any native stuffs. > > > It should probably go in java packaging project when it's done. > > > > Sure, I'm sure that there are a lot of people of this project with more > java knowledge than me. > Cheers Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
2009/7/21 Christian BAYLE > Hi > > I tried many time, but still got problem with IceWeasel-Firefox / > Eclipse binary part that is in fact prebuilt. These parts are for the hosted mode browser or also for the gwt compiler. In fact, to be able to upload gwt based applications to Debian, we would only need to have in Debian the gwt compiler. Maybe splittiing gwt in parts and trying to work in the easier first might be a good approach. > If you want to help on > this, and have some time, maybe try to get some explanation from > upstream dev about this part. > I have not much time, but I'm really interested in having the compiler in Debian, so if the eclipse/iceweasel stuff can be overrided this way, maybe we could work together with upstream to get this first target. > It should probably go in java packaging project when it's done. > > Sure, I'm sure that there are a lot of people of this project with more java knowledge than me. Cheers. José L. > Cheers > > Christian > > > José L. Redrejo a écrit : > > Hi Christian, > > Have you continued working on packaging gwt or just gave up? > > > > Version 1.7.0 has just been released, and maybe it's time to set up an > > alioth project in order to try to package this nice monster. > > > > It's a very powerful tool, theorically free, and it's a real pity to > > have it out of Debian. > > > > Regards > > José L. > >
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
Hi I tried many time, but still got problem with IceWeasel-Firefox / Eclipse binary part that is in fact prebuilt. If you want to help on this, and have some time, maybe try to get some explanation from upstream dev about this part. It should probably go in java packaging project when it's done. Cheers Christian José L. Redrejo a écrit : > Hi Christian, > Have you continued working on packaging gwt or just gave up? > > Version 1.7.0 has just been released, and maybe it's time to set up an > alioth project in order to try to package this nice monster. > > It's a very powerful tool, theorically free, and it's a real pity to > have it out of Debian. > > Regards > José L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#402841: any progress with gwt?
Hi Christian, Have you continued working on packaging gwt or just gave up? Version 1.7.0 has just been released, and maybe it's time to set up an alioth project in order to try to package this nice monster. It's a very powerful tool, theorically free, and it's a real pity to have it out of Debian. Regards José L. signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
