Bug#406692: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Xinerama info reported incorrectly to clients
Hi Dylan, Does this problem about Xinerama info not being correctly reported to clients still happen with xserver-xorg-core 1.3 and xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.0 currently in unstable? Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#406692: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Xinerama info reported incorrectly to clients
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:21:59PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > Hi Dylan, > > Does this problem about Xinerama info not being correctly reported to > clients still happen with xserver-xorg-core 1.3 and > xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.0 currently in unstable? The new i810 driver does not support Xinerama at all, so the current bug obviously doesn't apply. In principle xrandr should be able to do dual-head, but I haven't gotten that to work yet; in any case it's a separate issue. Peace, Dylan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#406692: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Xinerama info reported incorrectly to clients
Dylan Thurston wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:21:59PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > >> Hi Dylan, >> >> Does this problem about Xinerama info not being correctly reported to >> clients still happen with xserver-xorg-core 1.3 and >> xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.0 currently in unstable? >> > > The new i810 driver does not support Xinerama at all, so the current > bug obviously doesn't apply. I thought there was some kind of Xinerama emulation on top of xrandr, but I don't whether it matters here. I have seen a couple minor problems with clients in randr-1.2 dual-head, for instance a context menu not appearing in the expected position/direction. However, nothing really bad so far. > In principle xrandr should be able to do > dual-head, but I haven't gotten that to work yet; in any case it's a > separate issue. > Do you actually see some randr-1.2-related bugs? Or do you just need help/time to configure/use randr-1.2? In case it helps, I put some basic docs in section #5 of http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/ReleaseNotes a while ago. I'll keep this bug open for now, until you get a chance to test randr-1.2. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#406692: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Xinerama info reported incorrectly to clients
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:55:43AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > > > In principle xrandr should be able to do > > dual-head, but I haven't gotten that to work yet; in any case it's a > > separate issue. > > > > Do you actually see some randr-1.2-related bugs? Or do you just need > help/time to configure/use randr-1.2? In case it helps, I put some basic > docs in section #5 of http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/ReleaseNotes a > while ago. > > I'll keep this bug open for now, until you get a chance to test randr-1.2. Hi Dylan, Did you have a chance to play with randr-1.2. If you need help, feel free to ask. We have some other bugs about Xinerama problems, for instance #421449 and #431746. So if you don't care anymore of xinerama thanks to randr-1.2, we could close this bug. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#406692: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Xinerama info reported incorrectly to clients
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:51:27PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:55:43AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > > > > > In principle xrandr should be able to do > > > dual-head, but I haven't gotten that to work yet; in any case it's a > > > separate issue. > > > > > > > Do you actually see some randr-1.2-related bugs? Or do you just need > > help/time to configure/use randr-1.2? In case it helps, I put some basic > > docs in section #5 of http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/ReleaseNotes a > > while ago. > > > > I'll keep this bug open for now, until you get a chance to test randr-1.2. > > Hi Dylan, > > Did you have a chance to play with randr-1.2. If you need help, > feel free to ask. I've been travelling and just got back. There was a bug earlier, which seems to have been fixed; it works great now (with the exception of #432435, just filed). > We have some other bugs about Xinerama problems, for instance > #421449 and #431746. So if you don't care anymore of xinerama > thanks to randr-1.2, we could close this bug. Yes, please close this bug. Peace, Dylan
