Bug#408842: ping
Hello, On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:01:27PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > In fact I started already looking into it. We will upload a new package > > soon. > > Short, but important question: Are you going to update libsaxon-java or > are you going to package a separate package, e.g. libsaxon8-java? I'm > currently preparing the docbook-xsl Saxon and Xalan extensions for > Debian. But they are written to work with Saxon 6. Upstream told me, > that these extensions are not necessary with Saxon 8 anymore. So if you > are going to update libsaxon-java, I don't need to try to put the > extensions into Debian, because I would directly have to file an RoM > again :) It will be a new source package because its for XSLT 2.0. Saxon 6 is for XSLT 1.0. So its a bit different. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#408842: ping
Am Samstag, den 22.09.2007, 19:25 +0200 schrieb Michael Koch: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Any news on this bug report? > > > > I'm interested in seeing XSLT 2.0 support in Debian and there seems to > > be nothing. > > > > Are you interested in working on this bug report or should we NMU the > > package? > > Thanks for the ping. > > In fact I started already looking into it. We will upload a new package > soon. Short, but important question: Are you going to update libsaxon-java or are you going to package a separate package, e.g. libsaxon8-java? I'm currently preparing the docbook-xsl Saxon and Xalan extensions for Debian. But they are written to work with Saxon 6. Upstream told me, that these extensions are not necessary with Saxon 8 anymore. So if you are going to update libsaxon-java, I don't need to try to put the extensions into Debian, because I would directly have to file an RoM again :) Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#408842: ping
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 07:25:46PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > > Any news on this bug report? > > > > I'm interested in seeing XSLT 2.0 support in Debian and there seems to > > be nothing. > > Thanks for the ping. > > In fact I started already looking into it. We will upload a new package > soon. Thank you for the quick answer! and many more thanks for being working on this. /me happy and looking forward for XSLT 2.0 support in Debian. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ?/\All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema\/right keys at the right time -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#408842: ping
owner 408842 ! thanks On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Any news on this bug report? > > I'm interested in seeing XSLT 2.0 support in Debian and there seems to > be nothing. > > Are you interested in working on this bug report or should we NMU the > package? Thanks for the ping. In fact I started already looking into it. We will upload a new package soon. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#408842: ping
Any news on this bug report? I'm interested in seeing XSLT 2.0 support in Debian and there seems to be nothing. Are you interested in working on this bug report or should we NMU the package? Many thanks in advance, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ?/\All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema\/right keys at the right time signature.asc Description: Digital signature
