Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?
* maximilian attems [Wed Jun 09, 2010 at 04:25:09AM +0200]: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > > * Steinar H. Gunderson [Son Aug 10, 2008 at > > 05:03:28 +0200]: > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote: > > > > I've just read through bts #409271 :"initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not > > > > supported for root fs" > > > > and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny. > > > AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs > > > insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate. > > maks, we should discuss this issue in further details, > > we be great if we could resolve this in time for squeeze. > in a week i'm a back, but this is over ambitious. Fair enoug,. though if we have a conclusion regarding klibc<->libc<->busybox... solving this problem might not be that much work. But yeah, let's discuss that when you're back. thanks && regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > * Steinar H. Gunderson [Son Aug 10, 2008 at 05:03:28 > +0200]: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote: > > > I've just read through bts #409271 :"initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not > > > supported for root fs" > > > and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny. > > > AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs > > insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate. > > maks, we should discuss this issue in further details, > we be great if we could resolve this in time for squeeze. in a week i'm a back, but this is over ambitious. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?
* Steinar H. Gunderson [Son Aug 10, 2008 at 05:03:28 +0200]: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote: > > I've just read through bts #409271 :"initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not > > supported for root fs" > > and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny. > AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs > insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate. maks, we should discuss this issue in further details, we be great if we could resolve this in time for squeeze. regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?
Hello, I've just read through bts #409271 :"initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not supported for root fs" and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny. Thanks, @+, Fab PS : ccing nfs-aware people. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote: > I've just read through bts #409271 :"initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not > supported for root fs" > and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny. AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
