Bug#410882: gtkmm
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:40:15PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: > >I'm using gtkmm a lot these days and I noticed that upstream has already > >released gtkmm 2.10.9. Is there a problem packaging it or are you > >perhaps short on time? If you want I can help package gtkmm 2.10.9 (and > >glibmm 2.12.8, on which it depends). > > > > Once I have a chance, I will review the dependencies, and then upload the > newest possible versions for unstable and experimental. I've succesfully built gtkmm 2.10.9 and glibmm 2.12.8 packages. They didn't need any changes to the packaging. I didn't experience any problems with gtkmm programs that I've been using. Several other people have requested gtkmm 2.10 in the mean time, because their packages depend on it. I will therefore do a NMU tomorrow. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#410882: gtkmm
Guus Sliepen wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:40:15PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: I'm using gtkmm a lot these days and I noticed that upstream has already released gtkmm 2.10.9. Is there a problem packaging it or are you perhaps short on time? If you want I can help package gtkmm 2.10.9 (and glibmm 2.12.8, on which it depends). Once I have a chance, I will review the dependencies, and then upload the newest possible versions for unstable and experimental. I've succesfully built gtkmm 2.10.9 and glibmm 2.12.8 packages. They didn't need any changes to the packaging. I didn't experience any problems with gtkmm programs that I've been using. Several other people have requested gtkmm 2.10 in the mean time, because their packages depend on it. I will therefore do a NMU tomorrow. ok, thanks. -Brad -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410882: gtkmm
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 08:25:03AM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: > >I've succesfully built gtkmm 2.10.9 and glibmm 2.12.8 packages. They > >didn't need any changes to the packaging. I didn't experience any > >problems with gtkmm programs that I've been using. Several other people > >have requested gtkmm 2.10 in the mean time, because their packages > >depend on it. I will therefore do a NMU tomorrow. > > ok, thanks. No problem! I just uploaded glibmm 2.12.9, and will wait for the autobuilders to compile and install it on all architectures before uploading gtkmm 2.10.10. If there are bugs in my NMU (I hope not), I'll fix them of course. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
