Bug#415394: uim: Is it unavoidable to remove old libuim versions?

2011-08-25 Thread d+deb
tags 415394 + fixed-in-experimental
thanks

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:07:09AM +0900, d+...@vdr.jp wrote:
> reverted in anonscm.debian.org.
> need to fix package more.

fixed in anonscm.debian.org and uploaded to experimental.
-- 
Regards,
dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#415394: uim: Is it unavoidable to remove old libuim versions?

2011-08-12 Thread d+deb
tags 415394 - pending
thanks

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:31:50PM +0900, d+...@vdr.jp wrote:
> it is fixed in anonscm.debian.org.
> 
> libuim-data has just locale data.
> so it does not need to have tight dependency.
> now libuim(X) and libuim(X+1) are installable together.
> but i do not know libuim(X) and libuim(X+1) and uim-common
> can work well together...

reverted in anonscm.debian.org.
need to fix package more.
-- 
Regards,
dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#415394: uim: Is it unavoidable to remove old libuim versions?

2011-08-12 Thread d+deb
tags 415394 - help
tags 415394 + pending
thanks

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:07:14AM +0900, d+...@vdr.jp wrote:
> libuim* depends uim-common's scm files each other, i think...

it is fixed in anonscm.debian.org.

libuim-data has just locale data.
so it does not need to have tight dependency.
now libuim(X) and libuim(X+1) are installable together.
but i do not know libuim(X) and libuim(X+1) and uim-common
can work well together...
-- 
Regards,
dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#415394: uim: Is it unavoidable to remove old libuim versions?

2011-07-14 Thread d+deb
tags 415394 - experimental
tags 415394 + help
thanks

libuim* depends uim-common's scm files each other, i think...
-- 
Regards,
dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#415394: uim: Is it unavoidable to remove old libuim versions?

2007-03-18 Thread kmuto
Package: uim
Version: 1:1.4.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental

Hi,
I found libuim3(1:1.2.1-2) and dependent packages were removed by
a dependency issue when I tried to install libuim5 in experimental.

libuim5 depends libuim-data=1:1.4.1-1, and libuim-data 1:1.4.1-1
conflicts with libuim0, libuim1, libuim3 (<=1:1.2.1-2).
As this result, libuim5 kicks out libuim3 and some packages.

Although I'm not so familiar with UIM and its libraries, can't
you make these libraries coexistence?
The silent transition like this may give a trouble to dependent
packages every time.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]