Alle sabato 26 maggio 2007, JMC Alonzo ha scritto:
> Should rails-el package be named emacs-rails? The upstream project and
> tarball is named as emacs-rails and it would be confusing if the package is
> named as rails-el.
I don't know enough well about policies, just had seen there are many
minor/major mode packages which are called in that manner.
> In any case, I'm willing to cooperate and perhaps co-maintain if that's ok?
> I build my packages using hg-buildpackage and I already have a version
> controlled upstream and debian source for the current release. If you want I
> can put it up somewhere and coordinate things there?
Sadly, I'm not going to package emacs-rails, that's the reason why I just
filed a RFP bug. However I'm slowly learning about packaging and
maintainership, so feel free to contact me in the future (after all, I like
RubyOnRails and sometimes do use Emacs(en)!), even beyond testing purposes,
of course.
Cheers,
--
Luca Brivio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]