Bug#428896: devscripts: please consider a mechanism to Cc: bug and/or -submitter
Package: devscripts Version: 2.10.4 Severity: wishlist It might be interesting to include an option which Cc: either [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or just do it automatically for wontfix perhaps with some other analagous things or add an option for --dont-auto-cc). See #341065 for some context. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428896: devscripts: please consider a mechanism to Cc: bug and/or -submitter
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:39:45PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > It might be interesting to include an option which Cc: either [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or just do it automatically for wontfix perhaps > with some other analagous things or add an option for --dont-auto-cc). During DebConf it was suggested to automatically show the contents of emails to control@ if there are comments in the email. Don seemed receptive to that, so the issue raised in the bug you referenced should be addressed by that. I'm not sure how useful it is to CC the submitter when there are no comments included with the command. I could see having a "CC submitter if there are comments" config option though. James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#428896: devscripts: please consider a mechanism to Cc: bug and/or -submitter
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:10 +0100, James Vega wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:39:45PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > It might be interesting to include an option which Cc: either [EMAIL > > PROTECTED] > > or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or just do it automatically for wontfix perhaps > > with some other analagous things or add an option for --dont-auto-cc). > > During DebConf it was suggested to automatically show the contents of > emails to control@ if there are comments in the email. Don seemed > receptive to that, so the issue raised in the bug you referenced should > be addressed by that. This is #429649, which is fixed in devscripts' SVN. > I'm not sure how useful it is to CC the submitter when there are no > comments included with the command. I could see having a "CC submitter > if there are comments" config option though. I'm not averse to updating the patch to add an "also CC submitter on comments" option if it would be useful. This would however be an "and" rather than "and/or" choice. The patch for #429649 automatically CCs all of the bugs manipulated if any command has an associated comment. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#428896: devscripts: please consider a mechanism to Cc: bug and/or -submitter
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:04:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:10 +0100, James Vega wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:39:45PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > It might be interesting to include an option which Cc: either [EMAIL > > > PROTECTED] > > > or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or just do it automatically for wontfix perhaps > > > with some other analagous things or add an option for --dont-auto-cc). > > > > During DebConf it was suggested to automatically show the contents of > > emails to control@ if there are comments in the email. Don seemed > > receptive to that, so the issue raised in the bug you referenced should > > be addressed by that. > > This is #429649, which is fixed in devscripts' SVN. I was actually referring to a change in the BTS to show the contents of control messages if there's a comment. This will be useful for people looking through the bug logs where the maintainer doesn't use our next devscripts version. :) James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#428896: devscripts: please consider a mechanism to Cc: bug and/or -submitter
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 09:41 +0100, James Vega wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:04:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:10 +0100, James Vega wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:39:45PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > It might be interesting to include an option which Cc: either [EMAIL > > > > PROTECTED] > > > > or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or just do it automatically for wontfix perhaps > > > > with some other analagous things or add an option for --dont-auto-cc). > > > > > > During DebConf it was suggested to automatically show the contents of > > > emails to control@ if there are comments in the email. Don seemed > > > receptive to that, so the issue raised in the bug you referenced should > > > be addressed by that. > > > > This is #429649, which is fixed in devscripts' SVN. > > I was actually referring to a change in the BTS to show the contents of > control messages if there's a comment. Ah, oops. :) Obviously I misread your e-mail, but that sounds good. > This will be useful for people > looking through the bug logs where the maintainer doesn't use our next > devscripts version. :) There are maintainers who don't use devscripts? :) Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
