Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): > What I cannot do is to handle all the mails around the review to the > maintainer, translators etc. I can offer to look what you posted for > review and post the same for nbd and once that is stable hand that > over to you or the maintainer for further processing. I know your > mails starting from "planning review" over "review" and "requesting > translations" up to the final patch for the maintainer. These are Well, handling all that stuff is the main part of the review..:-) So, it seems that I'll have to start the review of nbd, then. Will do itwhen possible..:) > greatly appreciate but learning all the intrinsics vastly exeeds my > time budget atm, especially since I'd like to at least partially keep > my translations current while real life increasingly takes away the > time for it. > > Please tell me if that (little) help for nbd relieves you, in that > case I try to start it on monday. > > Greetings > > Helge > > > -- > Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de >Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php > 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred >Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
Hello Christian, On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Wouter Verhelst (wou...@debian.org): > > It sortof slipped my mind, too. I don't even recall what that 'hard > > work' was (hey, it's been almost two years), but if you feel like > > suggesting any other improvements, feel free. > > Hmmm, Helge, do you think you could handle an English review process > for nbd? After all, it's time for me to distribute work to share the > workload on English reviews...:-) In principle, if it is only for nbd, I can try, though I'll probably miss your high style of quality reached. Please note though that due to real life and me traveling I'll probably might not respond always very timely (depending on the time the review goes on). What I cannot do is to handle all the mails around the review to the maintainer, translators etc. I can offer to look what you posted for review and post the same for nbd and once that is stable hand that over to you or the maintainer for further processing. I know your mails starting from "planning review" over "review" and "requesting translations" up to the final patch for the maintainer. These are greatly appreciate but learning all the intrinsics vastly exeeds my time budget atm, especially since I'd like to at least partially keep my translations current while real life increasingly takes away the time for it. Please tell me if that (little) help for nbd relieves you, in that case I try to start it on monday. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
Quoting Wouter Verhelst (wou...@debian.org): > It sortof slipped my mind, too. I don't even recall what that 'hard > work' was (hey, it's been almost two years), but if you feel like > suggesting any other improvements, feel free. Hmmm, Helge, do you think you could handle an English review process for nbd? After all, it's time for me to distribute work to share the workload on English reviews...:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:41:46AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): > > Hello Christian, > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > That one has not been announced, so you are excused..:-). This comes > > > from private discussions I had with Wouter who *knows* that any > > > debconf template change triggers a mail by me..:-) > > > > Any ETA for completion of the current hard work and for the subsequent > > debconf review? (I hope this is not post-Squeeze :-)) > > Hmm, I'm afraid this slept out of my mind. Anyway, I think that the > initiative in on Wouter's side. > > Wouter, if you feel ready for a general review of nbd debconf > templates and control file, just tell me. It sortof slipped my mind, too. I don't even recall what that 'hard work' was (hey, it's been almost two years), but if you feel like suggesting any other improvements, feel free. -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): > Hello Christian, > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): > > > Hello Christian, > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:42:17AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > A review *will* happen for nbd, but Wouter and I agreed that it should > > > > only begin when he will complete the current hard work on the > > > > package. I even suggest translators to skip updates to that package > > > > right now. > > > > > > Sorry, I missed this anouncement. Is there a list somewhere with > > > packages wich debconf templates should not be translated right now? > > > > > > That one has not been announced, so you are excused..:-). This comes > > from private discussions I had with Wouter who *knows* that any > > debconf template change triggers a mail by me..:-) > > Any ETA for completion of the current hard work and for the subsequent > debconf review? (I hope this is not post-Squeeze :-)) Hmm, I'm afraid this slept out of my mind. Anyway, I think that the initiative in on Wouter's side. Wouter, if you feel ready for a general review of nbd debconf templates and control file, just tell me. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
Hello Christian, On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): > > Hello Christian, > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:42:17AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > A review *will* happen for nbd, but Wouter and I agreed that it should > > > only begin when he will complete the current hard work on the > > > package. I even suggest translators to skip updates to that package > > > right now. > > > > Sorry, I missed this anouncement. Is there a list somewhere with > > packages wich debconf templates should not be translated right now? > > > That one has not been announced, so you are excused..:-). This comes > from private discussions I had with Wouter who *knows* that any > debconf template change triggers a mail by me..:-) Any ETA for completion of the current hard work and for the subsequent debconf review? (I hope this is not post-Squeeze :-)) Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hello Christian, > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:42:17AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > A review *will* happen for nbd, but Wouter and I agreed that it should > > only begin when he will complete the current hard work on the > > package. I even suggest translators to skip updates to that package > > right now. > > Sorry, I missed this anouncement. Is there a list somewhere with > packages wich debconf templates should not be translated right now? That one has not been announced, so you are excused..:-). This comes from private discussions I had with Wouter who *knows* that any debconf template change triggers a mail by me..:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
Hello Christian, On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:42:17AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > A review *will* happen for nbd, but Wouter and I agreed that it should > only begin when he will complete the current hard work on the > package. I even suggest translators to skip updates to that package > right now. Sorry, I missed this anouncement. Is there a list somewhere with packages wich debconf templates should not be translated right now? Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
> While translating your Debconf template to German the A review *will* happen for nbd, but Wouter and I agreed that it should only begin when he will complete the current hard work on the package. I even suggest translators to skip updates to that package right now. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#430701: nbd: Minor errors in Debconf template
Package: nbd Version: 1:2.9.3-3 Severity: minor Tags: patch While translating your Debconf template to German the debian-l10n-german team noticed the following errors: -msgid "AUTO_GEN is set at \"n\" in /etc/nbd-client." +msgid "AUTO_GEN is set at \"n\" in /etc/nbd-client." -msgid "AUTO_GEN is set at \"n\" in /etc/nbd-server" +msgid "AUTO_GEN is set to \"n\" in /etc/nbd-server." -"If you remove or uncomment the AUTO_GEN line, a file /etc/nbd-server/config " +"If you remove or comment the AUTO_GEN line, a file /etc/nbd-server/config " -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
