Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible Hi Roland, 2008-01-28 15:08 Roland Stigge: Hi, another current instance with aptitude 0.4.10 (simple "U", "g" cycles): Setting up sun-java6-jre (6-04-1) ... Setting up acroread (8.1.1-0.6) ... Setting up acroread-escript (8.1.1-0.6) ... Setting up acroread-plugins (8.1.1-0.6) ... Setting up sun-java6-fonts (6-04-1) ... Setting up sun-java6-bin (6-04-1) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/java-6-sun/management/management.properties ... Installing new version of config file /etc/java-6-sun/security/java.policy ... Setting up acroread-debian-files (0.0.14) ... Press return to continue. (Reading database ... 304050 files and directories currently installed.) Removing orage ... Removing xfce4 ... Removing xfce4-mixer ... Removing xfce4-mixer-alsa ... Removing xfce4-session ... Removing xfdesktop4 ... Removing xfce4-utils ... Removing xfprint4 ... Press return to continue. (Reading database ... 303119 files and directories currently installed.) Removing thunar ... Removing libthunar-vfs-1-2 ... Removing thunar-data ... Removing xfce4-panel ... Removing xfdesktop4-data ... Removing fortune-mod ... Removing fortunes-min ... Press return to continue. Can you still see this behaviour with current/recent versions? Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
Daniel Burrows wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:04:12PM +0100, Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: there was just another example for the problem: After a system upgrade (u, U, g), without problems, I pressed U, g again, and as you can see below, some further packages were automatically removed which were not removed in the first run. Pressing U, g a third time, another packages was upgraded: After you pressed U, were there dependencies that had to be resolved? I think so, but I'm not sure. Will need to check next time I encounter the issue. How would I see it? On pressing g afterwards, I've seen a list of resolving results. Or how would I see it beforehand? Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:33:02AM +0100, Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: Daniel Burrows wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:04:12PM +0100, Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: there was just another example for the problem: After a system upgrade (u, U, g), without problems, I pressed U, g again, and as you can see below, some further packages were automatically removed which were not removed in the first run. Pressing U, g a third time, another packages was upgraded: After you pressed U, were there dependencies that had to be resolved? I think so, but I'm not sure. Will need to check next time I encounter the issue. How would I see it? On pressing g afterwards, I've seen a list of resolving results. Or how would I see it beforehand? Yes, the list that comes up when you press g is one way. Also, you'll get a red bar down at the bottom of the screen. See, e.g., http://algebraicthunk.net/~dburrows/projects/aptitude/doc/en/ch02s02s04.html The reason I ask, btw, is that the resolver is *not* necessarily idempotent in combination with U. That is, if you carry out its suggestions and it doesn't manage to upgrade everything, then the new input to the resolver will be different and it might settle on a solution that isn't a strict subset of the solution it found before. Also (see below) the resolver currently refuses by default to tell you to cancel all pending actions, so while it's happy to hold a subset of your packages back, it won't hold that set back when those are the only upgradable packages left. I would also be interested in knowing whether you see the same behavior if you run aptitude with the command-line argument -o Aptitude::ProblemResolver::Discard-Null-Solution=false'. i.e., when it's telling you to make changes the second time you run it, try passing that option and see if anything changes (specifically: does it try to hold all packages back?) Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:04:12PM +0100, Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: there was just another example for the problem: After a system upgrade (u, U, g), without problems, I pressed U, g again, and as you can see below, some further packages were automatically removed which were not removed in the first run. Pressing U, g a third time, another packages was upgraded: After you pressed U, were there dependencies that had to be resolved? Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
Hi, another current instance with aptitude 0.4.10 (simple U, g cycles): Setting up sun-java6-jre (6-04-1) ... Setting up acroread (8.1.1-0.6) ... Setting up acroread-escript (8.1.1-0.6) ... Setting up acroread-plugins (8.1.1-0.6) ... Setting up sun-java6-fonts (6-04-1) ... Setting up sun-java6-bin (6-04-1) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/java-6-sun/management/management.properties ... Installing new version of config file /etc/java-6-sun/security/java.policy ... Setting up acroread-debian-files (0.0.14) ... Press return to continue. (Reading database ... 304050 files and directories currently installed.) Removing orage ... Removing xfce4 ... Removing xfce4-mixer ... Removing xfce4-mixer-alsa ... Removing xfce4-session ... Removing xfdesktop4 ... Removing xfce4-utils ... Removing xfprint4 ... Press return to continue. (Reading database ... 303119 files and directories currently installed.) Removing thunar ... Removing libthunar-vfs-1-2 ... Removing thunar-data ... Removing xfce4-panel ... Removing xfdesktop4-data ... Removing fortune-mod ... Removing fortunes-min ... Press return to continue. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
Hi, there was just another example for the problem: After a system upgrade (u, U, g), without problems, I pressed U, g again, and as you can see below, some further packages were automatically removed which were not removed in the first run. Pressing U, g a third time, another packages was upgraded: [...] Setting up gcj-4.3 (4.3-20080116-1) ... Setting up sun-java6-bin (6-03-2) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/java-6-sun/security/java.policy ... Installing new version of config file /etc/java-6-sun/security/cacerts ... Installing new version of config file /etc/java-6-sun/fontconfig.properties ... Setting up sun-java6-jre (6-03-2) ... Setting up java-gcj-compat-dev (1.0.77-3) ... INFO: using old version '/usr/bin/python2.3' Setting up g++-4.1 (4.1.2-19) ... Setting up libgcj9-src (4.3-20080116-1) ... Setting up sun-java6-fonts (6-03-2) ... Setting up g++-4.2 (4.2.2-7) ... Setting up g++ (4:4.2.2-2) ... Setting up r-base-dev (2.6.1-2) ... Setting up libstdc++6-4.1-dev (4.1.2-19) ... Setting up libstdc++6-4.2-dev (4.2.2-7) ... Press return to continue. (Reading database ... 302696 files and directories currently installed.) Removing gcc-4.2-arm-linux-gnu ... Removing cpp-4.2-arm-linux-gnu ... Removing libc6-dev-arm-cross ... Removing linux-libc-dev-arm-cross ... Removing libgcc1-arm-cross ... Removing libc6-arm-cross ... Press return to continue. (Reading database ... 301579 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace gcc-4.2-arm-linux-gnu-base 4.2.2-4 (using .../gcc-4.2-arm-linux-gnu-base_4.2.2-5_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gcc-4.2-arm-linux-gnu-base ... Setting up gcc-4.2-arm-linux-gnu-base (4.2.2-5) ... Press return to continue. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
Daniel Burrows wrote: What should I look for during the next upgrades for debugging purposes? I'd say, double-check before you upgrade that nothing is being held back, and read the install output to check that the packages really installed correctly. I sometimes have a small set of packages that are manually on hold. But this stays this way until after the upgrade and this can't be an explanation for the multiple additional U-g cycles. bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
Daniel Burrows wrote: my normal way to upgrade the system is to start aptitude and press: u, U and g Newly, I need several additional U g cycles afterwards until nothing else is left to do. Today, there were about 10 (!) cycles necessary. The last ones being some automatical uninstallations (not many, though). Shouldn't all this be done in one run? Are you sure all the packages are installing successfully? Typically this sort of symptom is due to package postinsts that break the first time and succeed later times (e.g., because of dependencies that aren't declared). It's different from the common case that a package's configuration fails. In this case, apt/aptitude would also clearly state this. But here, there were several groups of packages to be installed after the first run. Each group consisting of 1-5 packages without installation/upgrade problems. What should I look for during the next upgrades for debugging purposes? bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:34:29PM +0200, Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: Daniel Burrows wrote: Are you sure all the packages are installing successfully? Typically this sort of symptom is due to package postinsts that break the first time and succeed later times (e.g., because of dependencies that aren't declared). It's different from the common case that a package's configuration fails. In this case, apt/aptitude would also clearly state this. But here, there were several groups of packages to be installed after the first run. Each group consisting of 1-5 packages without installation/upgrade problems. What should I look for during the next upgrades for debugging purposes? I'd say, double-check before you upgrade that nothing is being held back, and read the install output to check that the packages really installed correctly. If aptitude thinks everything is being upgraded, then it should be -- if not, we need to find out why 'U' didn't upgrade everything it could. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 04:35:12PM +0200, Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: my normal way to upgrade the system is to start aptitude and press: u, U and g Newly, I need several additional U g cycles afterwards until nothing else is left to do. Today, there were about 10 (!) cycles necessary. The last ones being some automatical uninstallations (not many, though). Shouldn't all this be done in one run? Are you sure all the packages are installing successfully? Typically this sort of symptom is due to package postinsts that break the first time and succeed later times (e.g., because of dependencies that aren't declared). Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#437291: aptitude: system upgrade more and more complicated
Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.6.1-1 Severity: normal Hi, my normal way to upgrade the system is to start aptitude and press: u, U and g Newly, I need several additional U g cycles afterwards until nothing else is left to do. Today, there were about 10 (!) cycles necessary. The last ones being some automatical uninstallations (not many, though). Shouldn't all this be done in one run? Thanks, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages aptitude depends on: ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.6-6 0.7.6 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii libc6 2.6.1-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.2.1-2 GCC support library ii libncursesw5 5.6+20070716-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a2.0.17-2 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++64.2.1-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 Versions of packages aptitude recommends: pn aptitude-doc-en | aptitude-do none (no description available) ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.1-1 parse Debian changelogs and output -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]